| In China,rural homestead system was carried out as a long-term,free,termless and welfare policy,that contribute to the living security and stability of rural society.But with the urban-rural integration process has been accelerated noticeably,the rural homestead system can’t fit in with the current urbanization process and the requirement of the urban and rural development as a whole.At the same time,because of institutional deficiencies and lack of withdraw system,a lot of rural homestead are now idle and inefficient,the residential area are even getting increase.For a long time,Chinese government policy committed to the paid withdraw system to dispose of the rural homestead,but it’s going slowly and inefficiently due to the peasants with deep faith in land and institutional deficiencies.The first part of this paper will introduce the basic definition of the paid withdraw system of rural homestead,and the significance of constructing it at this stage.The second part will go through very specific about usage condition,social environment and legal policy support,to analyze the necessity and feasibility of the paid withdraw system.The third part will be about comprehensive comparison of operation mode in each pilot area by analyzing the present operation idea and advantages and disadvantages.For example,the "central village" model in Shanghai and the "two change" model in Zhejiang Jiaxin.The fourth part will mention about the difficulties during the process at present.The last part will share new approaches based on the present paid withdraw system,we might discard the dross and select the essence as well. |