Font Size: a A A

Multidimensional Analysis On A Sentence Pattern Of Compound Sentence:"No P,only Q"

Posted on:2019-09-29Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:Z Y LiuFull Text:PDF
GTID:2405330548468504Subject:Chinese Philology
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
This paper makes a detailed analysis of the "no p,only q" complex sentence patterns in modern Chinese from three aspects of form,meaning and pragmatic value,and compares it with "not p,but q" compound sentence pattern.The full text is divided into five aspects:First,"no p,only q" in the analysis of form.We analyze the tie relation and causality respectively from p,q,subject position and deformed sentence pattern.The p and q in the compound sentence "no p,only q" are mostly constructed by noun structure.The location of its subject can be neither preceding nor later.At the same time,the deformed sentence pattern of the compound sentence "no p,only q" can be divided into the inverted sentence pattern,"no p1,no p2..." Only q "and" no p,only q1,only q2...""No p only q" and so on.The causative complex sentence is "no p,only q".p is mostly played by noun components,and the former clause can only be a declarative mood.q in the latter clause is no longer a noun constituent,but a predicate component.In terms of mood,it is mainly about declarative mood and sometimes imperative mood.In the position of the subject,it is consistent with the relationship between the two.Second,"no p,only q" in the meaning analysis.In the paratactic complex sentence,we divide the relationship between p and q into two kinds of simple relationship and compound relationship,and distinguish two different sentence patterns from semantic negation and pragmatic negation.In causality complex sentence,it is only a simple relationship.On the basis of this,we briefly analyze the reasons for "no p,only q" to form a variety of relationships:one is the polysemy of "only",and the two is the difference in the relationship of cognition.Third,"no p,only q" pragmatic analysis.We discuss its pragmatic value from three aspects.First,from the expression of speaker's explicit intention and hidden intentions,we see "no p,only q".Second,from the understanding of the listener's explicit intentions and hidden intentions,we see "no p,only q".Third,from the specific use value perspective,we see "no p,only q".It can not only highlight the focus of discourse,obtain the effect of convex dominance,but also make " trap",obtain novelty effect,and also to carry out" intelligence" to achieve the intention of subjectivism.Fourth,"no p,only q" and "not p,but q" comparative analysis.We have made a detailed comparison from three aspects:form,meaning and value.There is a difference between the two.
Keywords/Search Tags:no p,only q, form, meaning, pragmatic value, compare, not p,but q
PDF Full Text Request
Related items