The Relationship Among Emotion Regulation Strategies,Personality And Risk Decision-making Of Tibetan Undergraduates

Risk decision-making is defined as the individual's choice behavior under uncertainty conditions measured by the relationship between loss,benefit,The relationship between loss and benefits.Previous studies have shown that emotion regulation strategies and personality have a significant impact on risk decisions.Gross' s model of emotional regulation process shows that emotion regulation is accompanied by emotions,and the emotional stability in personality has an inseparable influence on the feelings of negative emotions;the research on the effects of emotional regulation strategies on risk decision-making also shows that different regulation strategies are risk-free.The impact of the decision is different.So what is the relationship between Tibetan university students' emotion regulation strategies,personality and risk decision-making?The study is divided into two parts.The first part explores the influence of different emotional states on the risk decision-making of Tibetan college students.Using a single factor completely random design,70 Tibetan college students were randomly assigned to positive emotion group and negative emotion group to perform a balloon adventure task(BART).The independent variables are emotional states and dependent variable risk decisions.The second part discusses the influence of Tibetan college students' emotion regulation strategies and personality on risk decision-making under negative emotions.The personality characteristics and emotion regulation strategies of Tibetan college students were investigated using the EPQ and ERQ questionnaires;60 subjects were screened according to the neurotic dimensions of the EPQ,and the two-factor experimental design was used.For mood regulation strategies(review of cognitive and expression inhibition)× neurotic types(high neurotic,middle neurotic and low neurotic),dependent variables are risk decisions.The reference variables for the two variables are the average number of times that the balloon was blown when the balloon was blown.Research indicates:(1)In the Tibetan university student population,there are grade differences in the emotional regulation strategies,and there is no gender difference.(2)In the Tibetan university student group,the differences in neuroticism,psychoticism and introversion were not significant at the grade level.In terms of gender,differences in neuroticism and psychoticism were significant,and the internal and external inclinations were not significant.(3)The neurotic dimension scores of Tibetan college students are negatively correlated with the use of cognitive reassessment strategies.(4)Tibetan undergraduates tend to seek risk under positive emotions,and tend to avoid risk under negative emotions.(5)Tibetan college students tend to seek risk when using cognitive re-evaluation strategies in negative emotional states,tend to use risk-avoidance when using expression-reduction strategies;tend to risk-avoidance,tend to risk-seeking with high neuroticism;The interaction between regulatory strategies and neuroticism is significant.Different emotion regulation strategies had significant influence on the risk decision-making decision of low neurotic personality.Expression inhibition strategies had significant influence on risk decisions of different neurotic types,and cognitive reassessment strategies had no significant effect.