The Diachronic Evolution And Synchronic Distribution Of "Shout" Type Commonly Used Words

The thesis selects “Hu(?)Huan(?)Jiao(?)Han(?)” that belong to “shout” semantic field as the research object,combined with modern linguistic theories,and combined with the diachronic evolution and synchronic distribution,with the combination of factual description and theory analysis and so on.the semantic chain of “Hu(?)Huan(?)Jiao(?)Han(?)” is from “shout” to “call?to do it”,from “call?to do it” to “call”.But its meanings produce at different time,have a fast or slow development,and the usage of each meaning is different in different times.The thesis is divided into the three periods: from Sub Qin to The western han dynasty,from The east han dynasty to Sui dynasty,from Tang dynasty to Qing dynasty.We make synchronic analysis of the meaning and the usage of “Hu(?)Huan(?)Jiao(?)Han(?)”,and inspect the evolution of diachronic of “Hu(?)Huan(?)Jiao(?)Han(?)”,to figure out the characteristics of its development and causes.This paper will make a synchronic analysis of the meaning and the usage of “Hu(?)Huan(?)Jiao(?)Han(?)”,and inspects the evolution of diachronic of “Hu(?)Huan(?)Jiao(?)Han(?)” in each period.It is concluded that: “Hu(?)” is the common word to express the meaning of “shout” and so on from Sub Qin to The Western Han dynasty.“Huan(?)” replace the position of “Hu(?)”about at Tang and Five dynasty “.Jiao(?)”was produced in Sub Qin,developed in the Tang and Five dynasties,and in the Ming and Qing dynasties replaced the “Huan(?)”.“Han(?)”was produced at early time,but its progress was slow,it did not develop until the late Qing dynasty.And we make synchronic description of “Hu(?)Huan(?)Jiao(?)Han(?)” in modern Chinese dialects and make a comparative analysis with the diachronic evolution,pointed out the synchronic distribution is the result of its diachronic evolution.In the basis of this,we inductive the characteristics of the diachronic evolution of “Hu(?)Huan(?)Jiao(?)Han(?)” and make an analysis of the causes of evolution from two aspects of language itself and the social factors.