The Analysis Of The Censorship System In Ming Dynasty

The patrol system is an important system for the local supervision of the local government,which is accompanied by the emergence of the supervision system.At the same time,it develops and perfects with the strengthening of feudal autocracy.From the beginning of the pre-Qin period to the initial establishment of the Qin and Han Dynasties,to the gradual maturity of the Sui and Tang Dynasties,the Song and Yuan Dynasties,and finally to the maturity and perfection of the Ming and Qing Dynasties,its development has undergone a long historical process.And the patrol system has different manifestations in each period.Such as the Han Dynasty's stabbing system,the Tang Dynasty's inspection system,and the Ming Dynasty's censorship system.Among them,the ruling system of the Ming dynasty,as a typical representative of China's patrol system,can be said to be the most complete patrol system in the history of China's traditional monitoring system,and is the highest level of the ancient patrol system in China.Studying the Ming Dynasty's censorship system,not only can clarify the development of China's inspection and supervision system,but also provide reference and reference for China's current inspection work and better power supervision,thus having the dual meaning of theory and reality..This paper attempts to conduct a comprehensive investigation of the censorship system of the Ming Dynasty from the three aspects of the development and evolution of the entire patrol system in China's history,the related content of the Ming dynasty's censorship system,and the enlightenment of the Ming dynasty's cenship system..Firstly,through a brief review of the history of the ancient inspection and supervision system in China,the evolution process of the inspection and supervision system was clarified in the vertical direction,and the emergence and development of the inspection system of the imperial censorship in the Ming Dynasty and its status in the history of the ancient inspection and supervision system in China were briefly outlined.And the difference with other inspection and supervision systems.Secondly,through the combing of the Ming dynasty patrol the imperial history,the patrol of the imperial history,the patrol supervision content,the inspection and supervision work related requirements,the inspection of the imperial history,and the work security,etc.The main content of the patrol system.At the beginning of the Ming Dynasty,Zhu Yuanzhang of Ming Taizu used the method and content of the inspection system of the previous dynasty to establish a system of patrol and imperial history.Ming Chengzu Zhu Di set up thirteen roadsto monitor the censorship,and selected the patrol of the censorship to make it a custom.During the inspection tour,the patrol royal history enjoys a wide range of powers.In addition to the supervision power,there are related personnel,judicial,military powers,etc.,and the power is quite heavy.At the same time,the patrol of the imperial history must strictly abide by relevant regulations,including performance requirements,inspection deadlines and so on.After the patrol was completed,the results were judged by the Ducha Academy and played on the emperor.Finally,after combing the Ming Dynasty censorship system,sum up its main characteristics,analyze its final alienation,corruption,and deviate from the original intention,in order to draw historical experience and lessons from it,in order to provide reference and reference for the current inspection work.The original intention of the Ming Dynasty to patrol the imperial system was to strengthen the supervision of the locality and thus strengthen the centralization of power,but in the end it was contrary to this original intention.Through the analysis of the imperial censorship system of the Ming Dynasty,this paper finds out the reasons for the alienation and corruption of the imperial censorship system in the Ming Dynasty.Apart from its root cause of feudal autocracy,its direct cause is its extensive The power of it leads to its lack of effective supervision,which ultimately leads to alienation and corruption.We believe that any power should be subject to supervision,and that the power of supervision is no exception.Simply relying on the quality of the priests in the history of the priests does not fully guarantee the effective functioning of the supervision system.