A Comparative Theory Of Lukacs And Kosik's Dialectics

Lukacs is one of the most important representatives of western marxism.Although he is a Hungarian,he has lived in Germany for a long time.Lukacs representative work history and class consciousness has had a profound influence on later generations.The concepts of "totality" and "materialization" in his works are the interpretation of marxist philosophical dialectics.Its theoretical ideas have positive meanings,such as the development of "generality",but also have shortcomings that we should take warning from,such as the exaggeration of "class consciousness".Kosik is the representative of the neo-marxism in eastern Europe after Lukacs."Concrete dialectics" is the representative work of Kosik,in which the concepts of "pseudo-concreteness","concrete totality" deserve our attention.Kosik once tried to deepen people's understanding of marxist philosophical dialectics,but his views fell into Heidegger's interpretation.From the basic standpoint of dialectical materialism,it is of great significance for us to understand correctly the dialectic of marxist philosophy by analyzing and comparing the dialectic thoughts of Lukacs and Kosik,and deeply understanding the rationality and irrationality of their dialectic thoughts.This paper is divided into four chapters.The first part is the literature review of Lukacs and Kosic.The first chapter of Lukacs and Kosik's dialectic theory of the origin of sorting out for the comparative study to lay the foundation.Chapter two summarizes and analyzes the main contents of Lukacs and Kosic dialectics to provide the content for the comparative study.The third chapter analyzes Lukacs and Kosic's dialectic thought consensus and the difference,forms the contrast research result;The fourth chapter is to evaluate the dialectics of the two,affirming the reasonable contribution and negating the unreasonable limitation.The author thinks that Lukacs and Koscik's interpretation of marxist philosophical dialectics are both one-sided and idealist.What is worth affirming is that both of them carry forward the concept of "totality" in marxist philosophical dialectics to some extent and have rationality.Reflecting on their misinterpretation of marxist philosophical dialectics is of positive significance to the correct andcomprehensive understanding of marxist philosophical dialectics.