| With the sustained and rapid development of the economy and society,the process of democracy and the rule of law continues to accelerate.The public’s demand for social fairness and justice is also constantly rising.The demands for safeguarding their own interests and rights have become increasingly strong,and the public has shown strong momentum in participating in judicial activities.To this end,the report of the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China pointed out:"We must speed up institutionalization,standardization and legalization of socialist democracy,expand the orderly political participation of citizens,and implement the rule of law at all levels." With regard to the professionalization of judicature and judicial democracy,it has caused fierce discussions in the academic community.The organic combination of judicial professionalization and judicial democratization is the basic direction of the new round of judicial reform.This paper comprehensively uses comparative research methods,cross-disciplinary research methods,historical analysis methods,etc.,taking the new round of judicial reform as the background,starting from the legitimate basis of public participation in judicial activities in China,and sorting out the theoretical basis for public participation in judicial activities,and summing up In the context of current judicial reforms,some of the frontier issues faced by public participation in the judiciary have clarified the path to a new round of judicial reform.A detailed description of the rationality of public participation in judicial activities was given to the public to participate in the clear value concept of judicial activities.At the same time,in order to pursue the value of fair and fair justice,the legitimacy of public participation in justice must be limited to ensure public participation.The judicial activities are carried out in an orderly manner.Using the methods of historical analysis,this paper summarizes the model of foreign public participation in justice and the experience of China’s Shaanxi,Gansu,and Ning’s "popular" judiciary,reflects on the shortcomings of China’s current participation system,and tries to design and improve the institutional form of public participation in the judiciary in China.The System Construction of China’s National Conditions.The innovation of this article lies in the combination of theoretical and practical research and cross-disciplinary research.On the one hand,it studies the legitimacy and rationality of public participation in the judicial system,enhances the credibility of the judiciary,and achieves procedural fairness.On the other hand,combined with reality,through the establishment and improvement of the system,the public will be broadened to participate in judicial activities and the democratization of the new round of judicial reform will be promoted. |