Research On The Innovation And Innovation Of Comprehensive Administrative Law Enforcement In C County

The main content of the reform of the comprehensive administrative law enforcement system is that the multiple administrative law enforcement agencies with the same or similar administrative law enforcement powers are merged into one department.The author holds that the focus of law enforcement is on the governments at the district and county levels.At the same time,this is the innovation,considering that county C is the first and only reform pilot that concentrated the administrative punishment power in the country.It also focuses on its good experience,analyzes the current difficulties,and explores whether its reform model has the possibility of popularizing in the county.At the end of 2011,County C devoted itself to institutional breakthrough and reform and innovation,and consolidated the administrative punishment power of 22 departments.After five years of trial,the Administrative Law Enforcement Bureau was formed,and the administrative punishment power of County C was uniformly exercised.The present situation of county C administrative law enforcement bureau is investigated and studied in depth,from the establishment of internal institutions to the establishment of coordination mechanism,from professional detection technology to information technology,from legal publicity to public participation mechanism.The achievements of the comprehensive administrative law enforcement reform in County C are incontrovertible and innovative.Similarly,the new problems arising from the reform should not be underestimated and the results of the reform should be discounted.First,the publicity of the rule of law is insufficient,the knowledge level of the Administrative Law Enforcement Bureau is limited,and the public's awareness of the rule of law is weak.Second,the level of professional inspection is limited,because not only the integration of similar and similar functions,such as the relatively professional administrative punishment power,such as environmental protection,food and medicine supervision,the return of administrative punishment power to the functional bureau;Third,the information platform of large data law enforcement is not perfect,and the system of information disclosure and law enforcement case is not shared,which leads to the problem of information lag,law enforcement transfer is not easy,and many windows are open to the public.Fourth,the concept of governance lags behind,and citizens 'participation is not high.This paper puts forward the countermeasures from four aspects using the theory of public management.Firstly,we should cultivate the thinking of the rule of law and intensify the publicity of the law and policy of administrative law enforcement.Second,introduce market mechanism to separate the professional inspection and inspection certification agency from the comprehensive law enforcement team.Third,improve "Internet + Comprehensive Administrative Enforcement"information service platform;Fourth,strengthen professional ethics and improve public participation mechanism.Finally,it is concluded that the reform of comprehensive administrative law enforcement in C county only centralizes the power of administrative punishment,and does not integrate the resources of supervision,examination and approval and service,so as to solve the problems of overlapping and blank functions in similar fields.At the same time,the relationship with the Bureau of reform and reform,township street has not been clarified,the functional boundaries have not been drawn,some new problems have arisen,comprehensive administrative law enforcement reform has yet to see results,from the mature administrative law enforcement reform is still a certain distance from the reform,let alone large-scale reform,it is not yet extensible.