The Research Of Copenhagen School's Securitization Theory' Defects And Its Development Trend

Security issues have always been one of the important subfields in international political research.In traditional security research,security is regarded as a national goal,that is,security is a predetermined concept.Security threats are mainly caused by the comparison of military forces between countries.With the increasing number of non-traditional security issues,traditional security research Explain the slightest.In the 1990 s,the Copenhagen school proposed the concept of “Securization” and actively deconstructed “What things can become a security issue”.It is believed that the formation of security issues is a dynamic process of political choice and social construction.Through speech,a non-public issue is constructed as a security issue.This shifts security research from one-way research between subject and object to two-way research between security subject and subject.This not only is more in line with current changes in security reality,but it also seeks to achieve the concept of achieving an overall security concept and a common destiny for humanity for China.Provides a new perspective.However,the current practice of security shows that many improper security phenomena reflect that there is still much room for improvement in the theory of security.Therefore,this article passes the basic content of the Gopse security theory,the performance and causes of the misconduct,and the development trend.To briefly explain,analyze and forecast,the paper is divided into four parts:In the first part,firstly explains the premise assumption of Copenhagen School's securization theory,demonstrates that the school's definition of security is currently the most appropriate to the security essence,and has the theoretical value and practical value discussed;then it combs and defines the theoretical framework of the Copenhagen School's securization.Research topics,in order to demonstrate that the concept of "safety" is neutral,the effectiveness of the security policy is affected by variables such as security referents,there is no absolutely negative meaning or positive significance,this is to expand the value dimension of the theory below,Constructive means and action plans leave room.In the second part,the paper analyze the flaws of the theory in the actual application.The main manifestations are the pan-security in the horizontal direction,the excessive safety in the vertical and the lack of security in the vertical.One reason is that some countries are confined to the threat of traditional zero-security thinking.On the one hand,with the increase of private authority in international politics and the development of science and technology,the theory and reality of security have derailed,specifically the security.The subject and the object are unitary;the medium for constructing security is single;the logic for de-securing security lacks operability in practice.In the third part,the paper look into the shortcomings of the security theory and the reasons for the development of the theory.Firstly,relying on symbiosis as a value to expand the security of the subject and object,so that the safety of different authorities(strength authority,market authority,moral authority,etc.)in the security practice to undertake the start,catalysis,implementation,supervision and security The role of practice goes beyond the position of national centralism.Second,non-violence is used as a guideline for action programs to expand the types of security media.On the one hand,it expands the security media to construct a security perspective and emphasizes how to overcome the threat to how to overcome security.Change the direction in which threats take place in order to curb over-safety or lack of security;Third,define the security ladder prevention and control of the pan-security phenomenon with the principle of inclusion and mutual benefit as the pursuit of interest,that is,prevent the concept of security dilemma from intensifying the security dilemma in reality.Finally,with the goal of sharing security,the logic of de-security is improved.On the one hand,accountability mechanisms for security actors are established.On the one hand,the audience's ability to rationally identify security is strengthened so that non-traditional security issues that have been mitigated can be truly realized return to social issues so that the state and society can rationally deploy response Resources threatened to form a positive force for the realization of benign non-traditional security governance.In the fourth part,the paper take the improper securization of global climate change issues as a case study.On the one hand,it tests the arguments of the Copenhagen School securization theory on the one hand,and on the other hand proposes feasible suggestions for the good governance of the global climate.First,using security theory to analyze how global climate change issues are "safeguarded" by the field of atmospheric sciences and eco-environment as an international security issue;secondly,to reveal the international security situation and the security logic behind the over-securization global climate change issues.At the same time,with the Trump administration's negative attitude on this issue,global climate change issues have a tendency of lack of security;finally,according to the prospects of the development trend of the security theory,countermeasures for the inappropriate security of global climate change issues are proposed: First,on the basis of launching the global climate change security process by major powers,sub-national actors are assumed to be implementing actors.The supra-national organizations act as catalytic actors.Domestic and international media serve as disseminators and supervisors,taking into account different actors.The interests of the company seek common interests.Second,the discourse construction of the global climate change issue shifts from a threat perspective to a risk perspective.That is,from the emphasis on how to withstand the adverse effects of climate change and how to transform under the influence of climate change,the external power giant is required.Only through supervision,testing,auditing The long-distance governance model strengthens the ability to adapt,adjust,and transform the fragile countries of global climate change,and then replaces some powerful countries to enforce their own governance models in the form of interventions to other countries in order to prevent and control the misunderstanding of global climate change security.Third,through the establishment of a small-scale public consultation platform for public consultation and a wide range of consultation polls to strengthen the rational communication between security actors and listeners,and maintain a balance between global security issues and security practices for climate change.