Font Size: a A A

On The Relationship Between Justice And Public Opinion

Posted on:2019-08-29Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:W W GuoFull Text:PDF
GTID:2416330566490752Subject:Law
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
In recent years,with the continuous development of the rule of law society,the people's legal awareness has gradually increased,and the expectations for the judiciary have been rising.Especially with the widespread dissemination of modern communication technology,since the rise of the media,public opinion has intervened in the judiciary and thus affected the judiciary.The phenomenon has occurred from time to time,and the relationship between justice and public opinion has become the focus of academic attention.How to deal with the relationship between the judiciary and public opinion,whether public opinion should intervene in the judiciary,how to intervene in the judiciary,what kind of positive and negative influences will the public's will intervene in the judiciary.the thinking of many problems should be based on legal norms and reasonable and judicial and public opinion Judgment of legality,through the establishment of a reasonable and perfect legal mechanism,rationally and cautiously absorb public opinion,through appropriate mean to actively guide public opinion,and form a positive interaction between the judiciary and public opinion.If the judicial error is not corrected,it will violate the judicial justice and the judicial credibility will decline.Therefore,through a rational analysis and in-depth explanation of the basis for the judging of the first instance and the verdict of the second instance verdict,the conflict between the judiciary and the public opinion,how the judiciary responds to public opinion,and how to improve its own mechanism,it is pointed out that the legal supervision of citizens can promote the judiciary.The impartiality and credibility of the judges enhance the judge's professional quality and professionalism,and the absorption of public opinion does not necessarily detract from the independence of the trial.However,the moral non-legal evaluation of public opinion is more subjective and non-professional,and the judicial response to public opinion should follow the principle of restraint.Improving and perfecting judicial response mechanisms harmonize justice and public opinion in order to achieve social harmony and stability.
Keywords/Search Tags:Public opinion conflict, Public opinion identification, Judicial response, People's jury system
PDF Full Text Request
Related items