Reform Practice Research About "Five Lists And One Website" Of Lucheng Wenzhou

The theme of the Third Plenary Session of the 18 th CPC Central Committee is to comprehensively deepen reforms.The goal of economic system reform is to make the market play a decisive role in resource allocation and better play the role of the government.After that,Premier Li Keqiang issued three lists of “power list”,“responsibility list” and “negative list” for the system construction.The purpose was to “bundle the government’s hands and let go of the market’s legs” to clarify the government and market boundaries and implement the right of simple administrationreform.In this environment,local governments have adopted a list to carry out the administration of decentralization and decentralization.In 2014,the Zhejiang Provincial Government launched the “four-single network” administrative reform of the “four-single network” with the “Zhejiang Government Service Network” as the platform.After the implementation by the municipal party committee and the municipal government,it joined the “Government Function to the Social Organization to Transfer the Directory List” and established the practice of reform with the content of “five single network”.LuChengDistrict,as a main city in Wenzhou City,Zhejiang Province,is representative of this reform.In order to reveal the reform process of Lucheng District,the author obtains useful experiences and lessons from it,and provides reference for follow-up and other administrative districts and counties to carry out this practical research.The research ideas of this paper are as follows: Firstly,explain and analyze the basic connotation of "five single network" and its theoretical role in decentralization and decentralization,and then draw the "five single network" reform based on the comparison between the actual situation of Lucheng District and the theoretical analysis.The actual effect,and now find the problem from the middle,and finally propose countermeasures.The paper is divided into five chapters in the structure: the first chapter is the introduction;the second chapter is the related overview of the administrative management system reform;the third chapter is the practice analysis of the "five single network" reform in Lucheng District;the fourth chapter is to deepen the "five Thoughts on the reform of the single network;the fifth chapter is the conclusion.Through theoretical research and comparative analysis of actual situations,the author has studied the “five single network”,namely “power list”,“responsibility list”,“negative list”,“financial special fund management list”,and “government functions to social organization transfer directory list”.And the actual effect of the “government service network” on the decentralization of the administration,found that there are problems in the reform process: local governments have obstacles in dealing with matters involving the central level,the progress of the special fund management list is slow,and the “one network” system is integrated.There are many obstacles to resource sharing and the long-term mechanism of the “five single network” work has not been improved.Suggested: Strengthen the lead organization,sort out departmental responsibilities,determine the responsibilities and boundaries of relevant departments,highlight public services,and strengthen the post-event supervision system.The conclusion is drawn that the “power list” has obvious effect on the limitation of power,the list of responsibility touches the government initiative,the negative list reform is still in the process of improvement,and the financial special fund management list promotes the focus of work from distribution to process,and the supervision work is more efficient.The transfer of government functions to social organizations to improve administrative efficiency,saving fiscal expenditures,and the one-stop approval of public service networks and public services have achieved initial results.The administrative reform of Lucheng District was generally smooth and the results were generally obvious.The reform process has been more than half,but because reforms are time-based,the general reform progress can reach 80-90% and infinitely close to 100%.In addition,the reform faces three risks.