Research On The Disclosure Of The Judgment Document Of Chinese Basic People's Courts

Judicial openness,along with the furtherance of judicial reform,is getting more in-depth.So is the concept of governing the country according to law,which has been continuously promoted since the 18 th National Congress.In this context,judicial open is not only one of the core needs for judicial justice,but also one of the vital means for judicial authorities to ensure equal justice.It is both a demand and a tool,which introduces new ideas to the judicial reform centering on trial.As a significant part of judicial justice,the publicity of judgment documents is to a certain extent the symbol of the process of judicial openness.With the widening of the public scope and the increasing of the public mode,the publication of judgments has become an established fact under the current institutional circumstance,which has brought enough support to transparent judiciary.However,the security problems that may exist in the process of publishing documents have followed.Security issues include,but are not limited to,fraudulent use of information,embezzlement of information,tampering with information,etc.,in addition,more security threats come from conflicts between public and privacy.The problems are closely geared to the development,but we can still expect to find a harmonious midpoint,which is what we need to explore today.In dealing with such problems,the grass-roots courts have made a lot of efforts.On the one hand,they must undertake the judicial reform process of the central government,and make every effort to ensure open justice,so that the judicial sunshine covers every inch of land.On the other hand,effective approaches should be considered by all means due to the necessity of security of judicial open.Thus the publicity of judicial documents will not become a criminal instrument to destroy the protection of information security.Combined with practice,this paper discusses the safety of judicial documents disclosure from the perspective of systematical design and information technology,hoping to bring some solutions to the problems in the practice of the publicity of adjudicative documents in grass-roots courts to a certain extent.