Font Size: a A A

Research On The Issues And Countermeasures Of Judicial Openness In Court

Posted on:2021-02-24Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:L X ZhuFull Text:PDF
GTID:2416330602471789Subject:Public administration
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Judicial openness is a major measure to implement the principles of the constitution law and guarantee the orderly participation of the people in the judiciary.It is an important part of deepening judicial reform and establishing an open and transparent operation mechanism for judicial power.It is also an inevitable requirement for accelerating the construction of a socialist country ruled by law which is of great significance for promoting the modernization of the judicial system and judicial capacity and better meeting the growing judicial needs of the people.Judicial openness adheres to the basic principles of judicial democracy and judicial fairness.Through the timely,comprehensive,and effective disclosure of the judicial process and judicial results,it strengthens the direct and indirect participation of society,exercises its historical mission of protecting citizens' rights and maintaining social justice and fairness,and realizes the democratic supervision of judicial activities to ensure that judicial activities can withstand the test of the people and history,thereby promoting the steady progress of the judicial cause.The rapid development of Internet applications has changed the social production and lifestyle,and it has brought fundamental changes to the information construction and application of the people's courts.Following the completion of the People's Court informatization version 2.0,which is mainly characterized by connectivity,and the People's Court informatization version 3.0,which is characterized by comprehensive coverage,mobile interconnection,cross-border integration,in-depth application,transparency and convenience,and security and control,the People's Court has basically completed.Informatization launched a comprehensive attack on the construction of smart courts,opened four major public platforms such as trial process,adjudication documents,execution information,and public hearings,strengthened the construction of portals and new media,and made full use of information technology to expand the openness of cases,judgment standards,and openness of reasons,judicial administration,and litigation services have pushed judicial openness to a historical height,and strive to meet the growing and diverse judicial needs of the public.Based on the general situation of deepening reform and rapid development of the society,combining public management theories,through literature research,survey research,and fieldresearch,sort out the development status of judicial openness in the courts,the problems and deficiencies in the field of public management,to further clarify the cause of the problem and the corresponding countermeasures.Fully combining the author's actual work in the Taian Intermediate People's Court,found that the judicial openness of the court has practical problems in the purpose of disclosure,public content,social acceptance of the information platform,and application of technology.In the actual work,analyzed it is caused by the lack of judicial openness,poor public demand expression,inadequate operation guarantee mechanism,and platform construction,etc.,summarized and put forward the focus on serving public management to improve the awareness of judicial openness,strengthen the demand for information exchange on judicial disclosure,improve the operation management mechanism and suggestions for improving 11 items in four categories of informatization construction application models.Deeply explore the content and means of judicial openness,expand the breadth and depth and the public management function of judicial openness to promote the optimization and development of judicial openness and provide more public services in the field of public management and create more public value.
Keywords/Search Tags:Judicial openness, Public service, Rights protection, Informatization
PDF Full Text Request
Related items