Research On The Legal Regulation Of Abuse Of Market Dominance By Internet Enterprises

As a new form of enterprise born on the development of Internet technology,Internet companies are highly active and innovative in the Internet market,and have produced various new,efficient and convenient Internet goods and services.At the same time,various disputes in the Internet field.Constantly,some Internet companies use the dominant position of their markets to implement acts that undermine free competition in the market and damage the rights of other competitors and network users.Internet enterprises are new forms of information industry based on computer knowledge technology.Compared with traditional enterprises,they are more inclined to information collection functions,and promote the flow and combination of various capitals in the Internet market on the basis of high informationization.Through the typical cases in practice,it can be found that in the Internet market,the fierce competition between enterprises makes the monopoly phenomenon happen continuously.Combined with the externality of the Internet enterprise network,the user’s stickiness and the characteristics of the bilateral market,the Internet companies are abused.The cause of the dominant behavior.This paper analyzes the ways in which Internet companies abuse market dominance in defining relevant markets,the application of anti-monopoly law,the method of determining market dominance,the distribution system of burden of proof,the specific components of abuse,and the implementation of supervision.At this stage,the requirements of the anti-monopoly system will be improved to cope with the new market structure and Internet operation model.Combining with the particularity of Internet advanced technology,bilateral market and operation mode,this paper proposes a way to comprehensively define relevant markets and determine market dominance according to the characteristics of Internet development.With reference to judicial practice and foreign legislation,it proposes anti-monopoly through negative list system and case guidance system.Practice guidance,not only need to divide the behavioral principles and standards for the abuse of market dominance,but also need to refine the specific behavior;finally establish a multi-level supervision mechanism to mobilize the enthusiasm of all parties in the market.I hopeto provide suggestions on the anti-monopoly practice on the regulation of Internet companies’ abuse of market dominance and the healthy and stable development of the Internet market.