| The Southern Song educator Zhu Xi summed up his teachings in accordance with his aptitude:"Sages teach,because of their materials,small to small,large to large,no one abandoned." Today,due to student athletic ability,sports basis,learning attitude,etc.To the same extent,university physical education courses need to teach students in accordance with their aptitude,match the students' level of exercise and training difficulty,and enhance the learning effect so as to achieve the purpose of cultivating a lifetime sports program.At present,due to the increasing status of China in the international arena of badminton and the charm of badminton itself,many college students have chosen badminton as an elective course.and how to make this part of non-sports majors full of expectations come from different students Based on the foundation of the movement,it is worthwhile to think about the gap between the learning effects so as to reflect on other university PE classes.It is required that the curriculum reform centered on" student development" should be continuously promoted.It is also one of the goals of the university's physical education classroom to meet the personality development and demand of students,so as to better train high-level talents who adapt to the future social environment.Compared with conventional teaching methods,hierarchical teaching requires teachers to stratify students according to their individual differences,stratify practice content,and stratify practice methods to ultimately improve learning outcomes and implement the teaching philosophy of teaching students in accordance with their aptitude.Objective and orderly division of teaching levels,with appropriate teaching methods to advance students'technical level step by step,so as to enhance students' learning confidence,improve the training interest of students with weaksports foundation,and further stimulate the outstanding students'athletic potential,and set various levels The vertical communication and flow among students is implemented through a flexible system of lifting and lowering levels,creating an atmosphere of mutual trust,mutual competition,mutual advice and mutual promotion,and exerting the teacher-led,student-centered,and main-training classroom forces.In this study,literature data,questionnaires,teaching experiments,and mathematical statistics were applied to randomly select two classes of students from the sports badminton class at Jilin Normal University as subjects,and then from two classes(74 people).Randomly selected 37 people as the control class and the remaining 37 as the experimental class to carry out a four-month classroom experiment.Through teaching experiments and questionnaire surveys to understand the impact of stratified teaching on badminton teaching quality,learning attitude and learning results.Get the following conclusions:1 The use of stratified teaching in the university sports badminton classroom is more conducive to improving students'badminton skills;compared with conventional teaching methods,the teaching effect of stratified teaching is more pronounced.This shows that the teaching of stratified teaching in the university sports badminton classroom has Certain feasibility.2 The layered teaching enables more students to feel that the learning content is suitable for their own level of exercise and mobilizes their initiative in learning.The flexible lifting system makes it possible to increase the difficulty of training and increase the level of exercise,and enhances the benign competitive awareness of students,which is beneficial to students' choice of badminton.As a lifelong physical exercise program,sports develop a lifelong exercise habit.3 through a semester of teaching experiments,found that the conventional teaching model in the badminton class is easy to overlook the popularity of theoretical knowledge,only for the end of the assessment content of a special exercise,which makes the control class cognitive learning effect is not as obvious as the experimental class,affective learning part of the effect is not obvious difference. |
PDF Full Text Request