| This article uses the literature material method,video observation method,three sections of index evaluation method and the methods of mathematical statistics to analyze the important matches from 2016 to 2019 of the six main rivals of China's men's table tennis team who will play in the 2020 Tokyo Olympic Games,and uses quantitative data to summarize their advantages and disadvantages technology,service placement,technology and placement used by the three board and the fourth board,and better and worse statistics and location of the fifth board to conduct an analysis and research,to find technique features and loopholes,which can provide the some theoretical basis for future competition and training.The research conclusions are as follows:1.Boll's competitive strength is mainly reflected in the receive-then-aggress part.Boll's technique and tactics in the receive-then-aggress part is relatively reasonable,and experienced.Although his serve-then-aggress part and rally part failed the assessment,his attack after service is more active and the rally part allows for continuous forehand attacks from the far end with excellent touch and anticipation of the drop point.In addition,he found the opportunity in the rally part that he could use the backhand to pull quickly to the loophole of the rival.All of these are the means by which Boll scored his victory.However,as Boll's age continues to increase,Boll's level of competition will be affected.2.Ovtcharov Dimitriji performs prominently in the receive-then-aggress part.Serve variety,and serve concealment,backhand attack ability is strong;the attack is positive,the batting quality is high,the angle is big,the strain ability is good,and Ovtcharov has the strong stalemate segment ability,especially his backhand attack isfast and lethal,but it is also accompanied by a lot of mistakes.3.The main feature of Niwa Koki in tennis ball skills is his flexibility and changeableness.The angle of playing is wide open and changeable,and the rhythm of the whole game can be well grasped and controlled.However,his weakness is also prominent.The strike strength of Niwa Koki is weak,and he has no comprehends suppression of the opponent's fight board.4.Lee Sangsu has a low threat to Chinese athletes in serving,and his serving points are mainly short forehand and long backhand.Lee Sangsu has a relatively good personal backhand technique,fast speed and strong strength,and a high percentage of receiving points in the stage.In the rally part,the hitting points change a lot,but the stability is poor,leading to a low scoring rate.5.The first impression of Harimoto Tomokazu is that his shouting,full of passion,and can directly or indirectly affects the opponent.In addition,he has the fast speed,sensitive pace,fierce front three plate on the hand,and strong attack ability.The return of the serve to twist and pull the drop point is flexible,and the ability to change the line is strong.He likes to use an aggressive “wing” in the receive-then-aggress part and serve-then-aggress part,and he can also got a good score.6.Calderand is fierce,with less points conceded in the rally part and the first three boards are fierce.He has a good sense of hand in the serve-then-aggress part,and can accurately predict the trajectory of the falling point of table tennis.In addition,the backhand attack ability of this player is outstanding,and he can get more points in this phase.7.To sum up,compared with China's excellent table tennis players,the six players mentioned above did not have an obvious overwhelming advantage in the rally part.But at the same time,in terms of the absolute advantages of the top three boards,China's excellent players also showed a weakening trend of suppression.Withthe constant updating of the international table tennis rules,Chinese table tennis players must strengthen the training in the service stage and the receiving stage,and seek breakthroughs in technology,in order to maintain the leading position in the international table tennis. |
PDF Full Text Request