Comparative Analysis Of Match Model Of Mima Ito Against Different Types Of Excellent Players In China

With the opening of Tokyo Olympic Games in 2020,Japan is still the biggest threat to Chinese table tennis team,and Mima Ito of Japanese women's team is also the No.1opponent of national table tennis team.By using the methods of literature,quadratic moving average methodand three-stage index evaluation,this paper takes the match model of Mima Ito of Japan against different types of excellent players in China as the research object,selects17 matches of Mima Ito against outstanding representatives of different types of play characteristics,Ding Ning,Wang Manyu,Liu Shiwen and sun yingsha as the observation object,and takes each match of Mima Ito as the research object At the same time,the use of technology and tactics(advantage period,adhesion period and disadvantage period)in each game is analyzed qualitatively by three-stage index evaluation method.The purpose of this paper is to find out the regular changes in the technical and tactical performance of Mima Ito against different types of excellent players in China by comparing the competition models of Mima Ito against different types of players,and then analyze the technical and tactical characteristics,scoring means,innovative means of Mima Ito,and put forward the technical and tactical strategies to suppress Mima Ito.In order to provide theoretical basis for the future training of women table tennis players of the national team against Japan.The following conclusions are drawn:1.The DMA value of the whole match against the fast arc players is mainly in the gluing period,followed by the inferior period,with the least advantage period;the DMA value of the whole match against the fast arc players is slightly different,especially against Liu Shiwen,the DMA value of the whole match is mainly in the gluing period,followed by the advantage period,with the least disadvantage period,with corresponding changes.2.In Mima Ito's serve round,the best way to play is against the fast arc players,and the best way to play on the receiving round is against the fast arc players.3.In the three periods of starting and grabbing:(1)in the three periods of service against the arc fast athletes,the main service is the short ball of the opponent,most of which is the backhand position,followed by the forehand position,in which the short ball against dining isthe forehand and backhand position,and Wang Manyu is the short ball and the half billiards of the forehand position;the third board technology is used in the advantage period,which is mainly backhand pull,backhand bounce and backhand defense,and the gluing period is more used Backhand pull and backhand play have the most kinds of techniques and tactics,and backhand pull is the most used.Among them,the dominant technology against dining is mainly offensive technology,and against Wang Manyu is mainly defensive technology.(2)The service to the fast arc players in the three periods is mainly short ball,in which the service to sun yingsha in the advantage period and the gluing period is mainly the forehand short ball or the half position of the opponent,in the disadvantage period is the backhand short ball,the service to Liu Shiwen in the three periods is mainly the backhand position of Liu Shiwen,with many changes in the length of the ball;the use of the third board techniques and tactics in the three periods This is mainly offensive technology,and sun yingsha's gluing period is mainly defensive technology.The three periods of stalemate: Mima Ito's use of techniques and tactics against the fast arc and fast arc players is different but slightly different,among which the use of techniques against Ding Ning,Liu Shiwen and Wang Manyu is mainly forehand fast play,backhand play and backhand defense,with more offensive techniques,but against sun yingsha,defense is the main,because In the stalemate,sun yingsha's strength is above Mima Ito.4.Mima Ito's average score rate in the starting and snatching stage is lower than that in the fast arc type;the average score rate in the receiving and snatching stage is higher than that in the fast arc type;the average score rate and utilization rate in the stalemate stage are higher than that in the fast arc type.In the comparison of utilization rate,there is no significant difference between the two types of play.5.The disadvantage of Mima Ito is more obvious to the arc fast athletes,because Mima Ito's playing method is to win with speed and strength.In the speed competition,Chinese athletes are relatively slower than Mima Ito.The reasons for the differences between the two types of play methods are: the maturity of Mima Ito's technology,the spirit of daring to fight,the rich experience of the competition,the changeable on-the-spot play,and the bolder handling of the key ball.6.Mima Ito's average score rate in the starting and snatching stage is lower than that in the fast arc type;the average score rate in the receiving and snatching stage is higher than that in the fast arc type;the average score rate and utilization rate in the stalemate stage are higher than that in the fast arc type.In the comparison of utilization rate,there is no significant difference between the two types of play.7.The disadvantage of Mima Ito is more obvious to the arc fast athletes,because Mima Ito's playing method is to win with speed and strength.In the speed competition,Chinese athletes are relatively slower than Mima Ito.The reasons for the differences between the two types of play methods are: the maturity of Mima Ito's technology,the spirit of daring to fight,the rich experience of the competition,the changeable on-the-spot play,and the bolder handling of the key ball.