The Hegelian Origin And Transcendence Of Marx's Dialectics

This paper attempts to reveal the core of Marx's criticism of Hegel's dialectics from the perspective of "Lukacs Proposition"-the relationship between alienation and objectification.To clarify to what extent Marx's dialectics originated from Hegel,and to what extent Marx surpassed Hegel's dialectics.The reason why we start with the relationship between alienation and objectification is,on the one hand,that alienation,as the core topic in Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844,runs through Marx's criticism of classical economists and Hegel's dialectics.In the notebook I and II of 44 Manuscripts,Marx analyzed the causes and four regulations of alienation from the field of political economy.The notebook III turned to the philosophical horizon and criticized Hegel's dialectics and the whole philosophy.Furthermore,whether objectification and alienation are equal has become the key point for Marx to criticize the falsity of Hegelian dialectics.This also means that the real understanding of Marx's dialectics can not be bypassed the overall grasp of the "Lukacs proposition".On the other hand,the relationship between "alienation" and "objectification" not only shows a series of characteristics and turning points in the development of Marxist thought,but also implies the ideological development path of Marxist Dialectics-Historical Materialism-historical science.That is to say,in what circumstances Marx criticized Hegel with the concept of objectification,which directly indicated that his philosophical position in this period was formed under the influence of Feuerbach's humanism.Later,Marx abandoned the original position in the process of further theoretical discussion and turned to pursue the inherent characteristics of his philosophy.Therefore,the investigation of the relationship between alienation and objectification is not only related to the correct interpretation of Marx's dialectics,but also to the overall grasp of Marx's ideological development.