Research On The Positive Interaction Between Public Opinion Supervision And Legal Supervision

The purpose of this article is to use comparative analysis methods to compare and study two controversial cases in the judiciary and public opinion circles in recent years,providing some ideas and suggestions for the construction of China's supervisory system,with a view to inducing state agencies in practice.Concern over the conflict and balance between the two supervision methods of legal supervision and public opinion supervision provide certain ideas for the establishment and perfection of China's organic integration of the supervision system for common development,and to achieve legal supervision in a timely manner and effective supervision by public opinion.The demands of healthy operation have enabled the public power to operate under the sun,thus achieving the goals of judicial independence and independence,establishing judicial authority and judicial credibility,adhering to democratic centralism,and making the socialist rule of law society develop in a healthy and orderly manner.Based on this,this article is based on the following research ideas to advance in order:First of all,the concept,connotation,characteristics and theoretical basis of the two supervision methods are introduced.At the same time,a comparative study of different views of the academic community,but also on the status of public opinion supervision in our country.The development factors were discussed,and through the elaboration of a series of basic definitions and related issues,some necessary backgrounds and theories were laid for the next step of research.Secondly,the author uses case study methods to analyze the approach of legal supervision agencies and the trend of public opinion supervision in two hot-spot cases,focusing on the discussion of the conflict and adjustment methods between the two supervision methods.First,according to the unfavorable practices of most news media in the case of the pharmacist Xin Yi,public opinion affected judicial trials,and finally reached the results of what some scholars considered as "media trials".It summed up that the news media should abide by the supervision activities of public opinion.The principle and the bottom line are as follows:Secondly,it analyzes the practices of the legal supervision organs and the judicial organs in the case of joy,and further affirms its positive influence,thus summing up the measures that the legal supervision organs and judicial organs should take in the face of the tide of public opinions.And made the response,and focused on the perspective of public opinion supervision that contributes to the fairness of justice.It elaborated in detail and conducted further empirical analysis.Subsequently,the author focused on the role of the media public opinion,a media of emerging media,in the supervision of legal supervision,analyzed its positive and negative effects,and proposed some effective measures to regulate the path of conflict between cyber public opinion and legal supervision.Finally,it is concluded that China's current supervision system is not yet perfect,and that the supervision forms of public opinion supervision and legal supervision are inseparable and combined.This concludes several superficial views on the combination of the two forms of supervision.The basic principles that should be followed when combining the means of doing a more detailed analysis and recommendations.The purpose of this paper is to discuss the necessity of constructing a sound supervision system in our country and the methods to solve this problem.At present,the research issues in the academic circles tend to focus on the relationship between public opinion supervision and judicial independence and judicial justice.The two methods of supervision,public opinion supervision and legal supervision,conduct in-depth research and analysis.The author aims to study the differences in the two types of supervision methods and the consistency of objectives,and combine them to establish and improve soundness for our country.The supervisory system provides some thoughts and lessons.Based on the above research ideas,this article is divided into four chapters,each chapter is as follows:The first part of this paper firstly starts from the definition and connotation of public opinion supervision and legal supervision,and analyzes the characteristics of the two supervision methods based on the analysis of the two related theories.It also explores the theoretical basis of legal supervision in China and the status quo of public opinion supervision.The second part of this paper studies two hot-spot cases that have been controversial and concerned about in recent years but have different judgment results.Through a comparative study of the direction of public opinion and legal supervision agencies in the case of Yao Jiaxin and Yu Huan,we found that legal supervision is The growth and progress over the past few years,and the principles that should be followed when conducting media supervision activities by the news media,and the response and handling methods that the legal oversight bodies should respond to in supervision of public opinion;The third part of this paper focuses on the impact of the media public opinion,which is a media of emerging media,on legal supervision.It begins with a positive impact,affirms the favorable aspects of network public opinion on legal supervision and judicial trial activities,and secondly has a negative impact on it.Evaluated,at the same time,put forward the ways and methods of regulating its negative aspects to make it more effective;The last part of the paper concludes that the combination of the two monitoring methods has its necessity.The prosecution agency should be closely associated with public opinion supervision while doing its own supervision work,with its fast dissemination,wide dissemination,and audience.The characteristics such as the large number of people help to build up the authority of the judiciary and the credibility of the judiciary,and work together to build a healthy socialist legal supervision system.