Font Size: a A A

The Benign Interaction Of Network Public Opinion And The Judicial Trial

Posted on:2016-05-06Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:L MaFull Text:PDF
GTID:2296330461984107Subject:Law
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
In the current "information explosion" era, through the Internet to keep abreast of all kinds of information and comment on people’s lives become the norm. The network of public opinion as to a new form of public opinion, on the emergence and grew up along with the vigorous development of Internet technology. In recent years, hot cases in the community set off a firestorm on the Internet, many of the Internet users in the case before sentencing, have published their views on the network, which can be called "public trial." Generally believed that the network of public opinion refers to public views and opinions on the Internet for an event held by the spread, which usually have a certain influence opinion, and with a certain tendency, with both compatibility, fast, interactive, non-rational characteristics. Network of public opinion is an emotional catharsis, while justice is a kind of rational judgment, the relationship between the two is very close. On the one hand, the network of public opinion the administration of justice, help help maintain justice, to a certain extent, reduce judicial corruption and enhance the credibility of the judiciary, but also can play the role of publicity and help cultivate legal literacy of the whole society; the other on the one hand, the network of public opinion will bring justice to some of the negative effects of, for example, will affect the independence of the judiciary in the exercise of judicial power, to the detriment of justice, and even affect the authority of the judiciary. Therefore, two aspects from the right guide online public opinion and improve the judicial mechanisms to improve relevant laws and regulations did not raise self-awareness of online media, and the media coverage of judicial cases to make certain restrictions, and constantly enhance the courts, the independence of judges and neutrality, strict judges elected to increase the intensity of open justice, which conflicts with the judicial balance network public opinion, to achieve both positive interaction.
Keywords/Search Tags:network media, justice, judicial independence, Supervision
PDF Full Text Request
Related items