Research On Social Co-governance Of Basic Market Supervision

In order to fully stimulate the vitality of the private economy,establish a standardized and unified market supervision order,and create a fair market competition environment for private enterprises,General Secretary Xi Jin ping pointed out that China's market supervision has entered an important period of institutional reform and institutional reform in order to deepen the reform of "release and control clothing".The Third Plenary Session of the eighteenth session of the Communist Party of China decided to reform the commercial system.The biggest change of this reform is the transformation of the system model from emphasizing access and neglecting supervision to extensive and strict management.It has greatly reduced the threshold of market access,created a market environment conducive to entrepreneurship and innovation,and the number of market players has increased sharply,which has promoted economic development.While bringing convenience to enterprises and stimulating the vitality of market economy,the reform also makes the supervisory power of grass-roots market supervision departments stretched.On the one hand,the contradiction between the surging number of main bodies and the limited supervisory power,on the other hand,the contradiction between the heavier supervisory task and the stricter supervisory requirements and the limited supervisory power.At the same time,with the development of economy,technology and society,various new formats and modes have emerged in the market.Especially with the support of Internet and big data technology,the market has changed from off-line transaction to on-line transaction,which makes supervision more difficult and more content.On the one hand,market supervisors and law enforcement officers will be troubled by the lack of supervision and supervision,and on the other hand,laws and regulations will be inadequate.The reform and improvement can not keep up with the social changes,so that the offenders have loopholes to drill.These contradictions and problems lead to inadequate supervision and public dissatisfaction.In order to improve the market supervision system,the market supervision institutions have carried out reforms.On March 21,2018,the State Administration of Market Supervision and Administration,the State Administration of Food and Drug Administration and the State Administration of Quality Supervision,Inspection and Quarantine formally established theState Administration of Market Supervision and Administration.In order to better complete the reform of the market supervision and administration agencies,China began as early as2015.In order to carry out the pilot reform of market supervision and management departments at the grass-roots level,the grass-roots governments of all parts of the country have adopted different modes of institutional integration according to the actual situation of different parts of the country,and established comprehensive market supervision and management departments.Under the dual background of institutional reform and institutional reform,the grass-roots market supervision departments are changing their functions and supervising methods.To a certain extent,the quality and efficiency of market supervision are affected by the quality of the team and the establishment of institutions.This paper takes the market supervision and Management Bureau of District D as an example to analyze the problems and causes of market supervision after the reform of system and institution,learn from the effective market supervision system of European and American countries,draw lessons from the excellent experience of grass-roots market supervision in China,and explore a new mode of market supervision which is led by the government and jointly participated by multi-subjects of society,relying on the new one.In the era of Internet big data technology,we should promote the transformation of market supervision methods,strive to build an effective market supervision and social co-governance system based on the legal system,and better solve the problems of market supervision at the grass-roots level.