Comparative Study Of Models And Effects Of Rural Revitalization Between China And Japan

Rural Revitalization as a new strategy for the development of agriculture,rural areas and farmers proposed by the No.1 Document of the Central Committee in 2018,it’s model needs urgent research.In the past 40 years of reform and opening up,China’s agricultural and rural areas have made historic achievements.However,China’s "three rural issues" are still outstanding,especially the "three rural" and "four modernizations","rural hollowing out","agricultural marginalization" and "peasant aging" of the "new three rural" problem.The implementation of the rural revitalization strategy is a major strategic deployment based on the new stage,new laws,new tasks of the "three rural"development in the new era,and is an inevitable requirement for the development of agriculture and rural areas in the new era.Japan has issued the "Agricultural Basic Law1’,"Basic Guidelines for Structural Policy","Agricultural Promotion Law","Agricultural Land Law","Agricultural Association Law" and "Agricultural Pension Fund Law" since the 1960s,marking Japan’s revitalization of agriculture began.The village-making movement launched in the 1970s laid the foundation for the revitalization of the Japanese countryside.Through the rural revitalization,the current rural infrastructure in Japan is sound,the per capita income of farmers is high,and the income gap between urban and rural areas is small.Its rural revitalization experience is worth learning.Therefore,this article summarizes the rural revitalization models and effects of China and Japan,and analyzes the shortcomings in China’s rural revitalization and based on the excellent experience of revitalizing the Japanese countryside,I propose suggestions for improving the revitalization of our country.First of all,according to the review of the No.1 Document of the Central Committee over the years,the relationship between beautiful villages,new rural construction and rural revitalization is analyzed.According to the theoretical guidance of data integrity and sample diversity,rural revitalization cases in eleven provinces of Guangdong,Taiwan,Zhejiang,Sichuan,Jiangsu,Jiangxi,Shaanxi,Anhui,Shandong and Shanghai are selected.Japan selected sixteen Cases from seven regions in Hokkaido,Northeast,Kanto,Chubu,Kinki,Shikoku and Kyushu.The data is summarized from the location,development content,development status and data sources,and provides data basis for the following rural revitalization model summary and effect analysis.Secondly,according to the development content and business entities,China’s rural revitalization model is divided into Industry-driven model,Natural resource development model,Traditional folk protection model,leisure and rural tourism around the city,Village collective+agricultural cooperative +farmer model,Village collective+farmer model,Government+village collective+farmer model,Village collective+enterprise+farmer model.Japanese’s rural revitalization model is divided into Industry-driven model,Natural resource development model,Traditional folk protection model,leisure and rural tourism around the city,Family farm+agricultural association model,enterprise+agricultural association+farmer model,government+agricultural association+farmer model.Through the comparison of the rural revitalization model between China and Japan,it is concluded that the two countries have the same approach in terms of industrial driving and natural resource development;Japan’s protection awareness is stronger in the traditional folk protection model;In the mode of leisure and rural tourism around the city,Japan is mostly in the form of civic farms;Japan is more perfect in the organizational structure of agriculture;Japan is more adaptable to market mechanisms in family farm operations.Thirdly,analysis of rural revitalization effects in China and Japan.It is concluded that the characteristic of revitalization effect of China is The development of two level agriculture is good;Non-agricultural industry has strong development momentum;Agricultural product brand competitiveness is weak;Ecological protection and waste control have achieved remarkable results;The effect of ecological economic is obvious;The effect of ideological and moral and public cultural construction is obvious;Weak sense of folklore inheritance;Villager autonomy and construction of villagers’ council are weak;Legal publicity is obvious;Farmers?income has increased significantly;the characteristic of revitalization effect of Japan is Agriculture and industry and commerce flilly cooperate;the degree of branding of agricultural products is high;The awareness of inheritance of folk customs and protection of ecological are weak;The rural legal system is perfect;Agricultural Association Improves Farner Status;Through the comparison of the rural revitalization effect between China and Japan,the rural revitalization effect of the two countries is consistent;the degree of rural revitalization effect in Japan is higher.Finally,we find out the shortcomings in the rural revitalization of China:the lack of brand awareness of the operators;the low scientific and technological content of agricultural products;the serious damage to the ecological environment;the weak inheritance of folk culture;the organizational structure of agricultural partners is not perfect.In view of the above problems,we draw on the excellent experience of rural revitalization in Japan,propose to improve the internal mechanism of cooperatives;Enhance the function of cooperatives;Conduct cultural heritage certification activities;Increase financial support;Pay attention to the inheritance education of young people’s traditional culture;Organizing farmers’ re-education activities.