| The Internet and the digitisation of content have allowed new pathways to production and distribution. This is positive from one perspective, as it allows many once-excluded individuals access to the creative process. However, technological innovation has also lowered "natural" barriers to widespread copyright infringement. Copyright owners have sought expanded copyright protection as a result. Different interests groups have variously responded. Some have declared copyright of little relevance. Others advocate recognition of "users' rights;" the view articulated in CCH Canadian Ltd v. Law Society of Upper Canada. I argue that while unchecked copyright expansion could be undesirable when thinking about the public domain, it may not be necessary to conceive of an extra layer of users' rights in order to achieve a balanced copyright. A workable compromise can be found in further consideration of authorship in copyright, a concept which dictates the nuances of copyright as a whole. |
