The case of the Yavapai County, Arizona water conflict: A power and politics analysis

This investigation asks why, after more than 20 years, a geopolitical conflict over management of the Verde River remains unresolved. In order to discover what conditions and factors explain why this dispute continues without resolution, I first discuss case-relevant theories, including deliberative democracy, network analysis and power relationships. Findings from 35 interviews of selected stakeholder group members are then embedded in a theoretical discussion of ways in which power and collaborative relationships interplay in this case. This discussion weaves together the interview findings and existing theories to reveal similarities and differences that describe and illuminate the case and provide support for recommendations offered. I next consider the links between science and power by examining the ways in which the interface of science, technology and power influences deliberative processes. Finally, I summarize my research and offer recommendations for resolution of the conflict. My major working hypothesis is that the continuation of debate and the absence of substantive positive action and resolution of the water management dispute indicate that processes used to inform and engage a majority of citizens in Yavapai County has not been effective. I also hypothesize that various aspects of power are strongly influencing and/or preventing resolution of this ongoing conflict.;I designed this case study to discover why the conflict is ongoing and what might be done to resolve it in order to preserve and maintain the Verde River as one of the few remaining perennial streams in Arizona. This exemplary case provides an empirical application useful for natural resource policy development in complex situations.