| China is in the era of "ecological awakening",and it has become the consensus of the whole society that "a good ecological environment is the fairest public good".In 2013,the third plenary session of the 18th central committee of the communist party of China adopted the decision of the central committee of the communist party of China on several major issues concerning comprehensively deepening reform,which for the first time clarified the control policy of ecological space and raised the control of ecological space to a new height.The implementation of the ecological space control policies,construction of urban ecological security,to prevent the disorder spread,etc all have important significance,but the ecological space control area is not the "no man’s land" or "the box",due to the mandatory environmental regulation policy,control area residents can only passive follow the policy,which may be ignored,departure from,or damage to the part of the rational demands and development of village residents will,thus appeared to undertake the environmental responsibility and did not receive enough unfair phenomenon in the welfare of the people’s livelihood.The report of the 17th national congress made it clear,to achieve social equity and justice is a major task for developing socialism with Chinese characteristics,the eighteenth big reports pointed out that social justice contains fair right,fair chance and fair regulation,also clearly put forward "to safeguard and improve people’s livelihood in a more prominent position",which fully reflects the "livelihood of the people oriented" scientific idea of ruling.As one of the core stakeholders in the protection and development of the ecological control area,the residents in the ecological control area should bear more responsibilities or pay more costs than their benefits due to the intervention of planning policies.As a vulnerable group,the planners should protect their interests from being infringed during the planning process.The core issue of people’s livelihood equity in ecologically controlled areas is how to realize the fair distribution of people’s livelihood welfare and the protection of indigenous people’s livelihood rights and interests.Based on the above background,this paper focuses on the existence,development and social welfare inequity of the villages in the urban ecological control area and the possible adaptive development paths under the constraint effect of urban ecological control.And "four mountain environment in chongqing metropolis zone" as an example,through literature review and field investigation,analyzed the four hill area at present the problems of people’s livelihood unfair regulations and internal causes,and put forward the evaluation system of the people’s livelihood from the Angle of sociology,through space(compared with adjacent non-controlled),time(10 years compared to the same community)2 dimension,from ecological environment index,income index and quality of life index and livable life four aspects of building the appraisal model of the justice of the people’s livelihood,and the centre sill town as an example,the controlled development status was evaluated before and after the people’s livelihood.,according to the results of ecological control policy implementation after the town centre sill exists unfair conditions of the people’s livelihood,especially livable life and economic income of injustice in the field of two strong,consistent with field research status,and finally,in view of the above results,this article from the planning objectives,planning,control technology,industrial development and policy tools five aspects put forward the countermeasures of promoting ecological zone and people’s livelihood fairness.This paper is expected to push the government to pay more attention to the issue of people’s livelihood equity in the eco-control area,and remind the government to further improve equity measures in the process of urban planning formulation and implementation,so as to ease people’s livelihood conflicts,guide the regulated communities to reasonably safeguard their rights and fulfill their responsibilities,and effectively benefit the public with environmental dividends. |