Research On The Index Of Judicial Fairness In The Judicial Evaluation System Of China

"Judicial justice feeling" and "judicial justice" are two completely different concepts.Feelings in judicial justice feelings are not epistemological feelings,they are emotions produced by comprehensive judgments in accordance with the purpose,they are the situation of the people in the judicial context or Generated during the interaction.Understanding the relationship between whether the people can feel judicial justice and the degree of feeling and whether the judiciary can achieve judicial justice and the degree of realization is to achieve the judicial goal of "trying to make the people feel fair and just in every judicial case" The problem to be solved first.Judicial justice experience more involves people’s subjective feelings,and it is particularly important to grasp the psychological factors that affect the people’s judicial justice experience;the research on the evaluation of the rule of law index is not only a need for the development of theoretical law,but also an inevitable requirement for the development of China’s rule of law practice.Justice is the core link in the construction of the rule of law,and the status of judicial evaluation is self-evident.The current judicial evaluation in China ignores the conversion process between the objective justice and the subjective perception of judicial justice.In the new historical period,a clear distinction is made between "judicial justice" and "judicial justice experience",and the introduction of the judicial justice experience index is the need to establish the "substantial,procedural,and experience" ternary judicial justice concept.At the same time,the judicial justice perception index is a key index to improve the judicial evaluation system.Evaluating the judicial justice perception of the people is an essential means to promote the construction of judicial rule of law and an important way to enhance the judicial justice perception of the people.The judicial justice experience index should adhere to the people-centered value concept,the use of discipline-theory fusion of thinking,and the design of the principle of joint promotion of theoretical practice.It needs to cover "justice of case results","justice of judicial process","judicial Content of four levels of "service experience" and "judicial sense of integrity".Independent third-party organizations use scientific methods to organize assessments,so that the judiciary can treat the disease properly,apply the results of the judicial justice perception index feedback to the construction of the judicial rule of law,improve the judicial work in a timely manner,improve the quality of judicial justice,and strive to let the people in every Fairness and justice are felt in judicial cases.