| The disciplinary inspection and supervision agencies are responsible for most of the specific work tasks of the dispatched agencies.They are the front lines of corruption prevention,anti-corruption,oversight in advance,and warning education.They are the "probes" for the supervision of disciplinary inspection and supervision agencies.Under the "dual leadership" mechanism,the dispatched agencies are mainly dominated by leaders of party committees or party groups in departments.This heavy mechanism is not conducive to efficient supervision.The close interest relationship between the dispatched agencies and the resident departments has led disciplinary inspection and supervision cadres to dare not supervise Willing to supervise,not wanting to supervise.Discipline Inspection and supervision of human resources scattered,but also resulted in a long-term non-exchange between the various cadres stationed in the situation.In the early 1990 s,a few places such as Shenzhen and Hainan have begun piloting the unified management of dispatched agencies.In April 2004,the Central Discipline Inspection Commission’s Supervision Department implemented reforms in its 36 disciplinary inspection and dispatch agencies.Unified management and change of the "double-leadership" leadership system before the dispatching agencies.Disciplinary inspection and supervision of reforms of the dispatching agencies have been successively carried out at all levels.At the Third Plenary Session of the Eighteenth Central Committee,it was officially stated that the dispatching disciplinary agencies should be under unified management.Responsible for the dispatching agency.In the 2010 revised version of the Administrative Supervision Law,relevant regulations were also introduced.The supervisory agency and cadres dispatched by the supervisory agency are directly responsible for the dispatching supervisory agency and report their work in accordance with the regulations.AgencyQ District Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision has implemented the reform of the discipline inspection and supervision agency since July 2018.It has implemented a unified name and unified management of the discipline inspection and supervision agencies in the district’s direct departments,and reformed and perfected the original "double leadership" system and The working mechanism focuses on the duties and responsibilities of supervision and discipline accountability,supervision of law enforcement and disposal functions,focus on the key tasks of party style and clean government construction and anti-corruption,and strengthens the authority and independence of the disciplined commissions and supervisory agencies,with a view to further strengthening the parties in q districts.Implementation of a clean and honest government and anti-corruption work.How to further streamline the management system of the sending agencies,promote the establishment and improvement of the monitoring mechanism with special characteristics of the q zone;how to improve the management and supporting systems of the sending agencies,and improve the work efficiency of the sending agencies Effectively play the role of "probe" for disciplinary inspection and supervision.Based on the research on the background,significance,and historical changes of the unified management system reform of the discipline inspection and supervision system in China,the author systematically analyzes its basics in nine aspects,such as institution setting,establishment setting,and basic principles,based on the practice of reforms of the discipline inspection and supervision institutions in q district Practices,summing up the preliminary results achieved in q-zone.Through the analysis of anti-corruption reforms or new measures at home and abroad,comprehensively applying relevant theories of public management,using case analysis and literature analysis,visiting the work of each discipline inspection and supervision team in q-zone Actually,collect the problems existing in the work and the factors that restrict the effectiveness of the work,and analyze the problems.First,independence and authority are still lacking to a certain extent;second,limited supervision of team members,and some discipline inspection teams have unequal powers and responsibilities;three The work needs to be strengthened,and some discipline inspection teams have formalistic supervision;the fourth is the construction of some of the stationed personnel and the quality of their business needs to be improved;the fifth is the limitation of the source of the clues of the stationed agencies and the effect of investigating cases is not obvious.It also systematically and comprehensively analyzed the objective and subjective reasons.First,the lagging of the cadre team,This system is not perfect;the second is the inaccurate positioning of the functions and the dispatched personnel do not completely straighten out the relationship;the third is that the ranks of some disciplinary inspection teams do not match the supervision authority and there is a sense of distress;the fourth is the acquaintance society,the "friend circle" is sad;It is a paradox of the stationing model itself.It also aims at how to further streamline the management system of the stationed agencies,improve the management and supporting systems of the stationed agencies,and effectively play the role of the "probe" of the discipline inspection and supervision,so that the disciplined commissioned agencies can operate efficiently. |
