Research On The Change Of Online Car Hailing Regulatory Policy From The Perspective Of Advocacy Alliance Theory

In recent years,the rapid development of Internet technology has promoted the rise of sharing economy.As a typical representative of the sharing economy,online car Hailing not only brings new weather such as improving the travel efficiency of users,opening up the "terminals" of the city,improving the utilization rate of idle vehicles,and increasing employment,but also breaks the "iron rice bowl" of taxis in the taxi market,which intensifies the contradiction between the opposing alliances of online car hailing,and then leads to taxi strike,government containment,and group fighting At the same time,some problems,such as the lag of online car Hailing supervision policy,the lack of online car Hailing safety facilities and so on,seriously affect social security.In July 2016,the "Interim Measures" came into being,making online car Hailing obtain legal status,easing social contradictions and standardizing the order of taxi market.Up to now,there are new problems in online car hailing,and new methods are urgently needed.This paper takes the process of online car Hailing policy as the research object to explore the influencing factors of the change of online car Hailing regulatory policy.In the theory of policy change,after years of adjustment and improvement,advocacy alliance theory has increasingly become a grand theory,which has representative value in explaining the process of policy change.Based on the analysis framework of advocacy alliance,combined with the actual changes of online car Hailing supervision policy,this paper analyzes the online car Hailing supervision policy of major cities in China by using cluster analysis method,and constructs an analysis framework of online car Hailing supervision policy from the perspective of advocacy alliance.Within the online car Hailing supervision policy subsystem,the taxi strike across the country promotes the development of government policy to deal with the chaos of the taxi market,public opinion "storm" in the network car Hailing operation frequent security problems caused by the internal shock of the policy subsystem,holding different policy beliefs of the opposition alliance,with the advantage of its resources,in the strategic struggle at the same time,but also with the flow of members,the policy learning inside and outside the alliance,in order to make the regulatory policy to the best Reflect your beliefs to a large extent.Outside the policy subsystem,the sharing economy has further developed,and the domestic democratization process has provided a "policy space" for all parties to speak rationally,which makes the masses and mainstream media take the initiative to speak out in the change of online car Hailing regulatory policy.Some local governments have gradually relaxed the online car Hailing regulation,and the originally inclusive regulatory cities have been recognized by the society,which has triggered the development of policy studies in some cities Xi said that under the pressure of local governments,the central government issued new policies to encourage the development of sharing economy and digital economy.Under the influence of internal and external factors,we can see that the power of the online car Hailing development alliance is on the rise,and the resource advantage of the alliance is beginning to highlight.After obtaining the legal identity,although it has been strictly supervised for a period of time,the trend of deregulation in various places has appeared.In the final analysis,it is because the online car Hailing meets the needs of the times.However,the safety supervision of online car Hailing is still the focus of strengthening supervision.In the process of online car Hailing regulatory policy changes,there are some problems in alliance strategy,such as the loss of public value,irrational voice and so on.In addition,due to the lack of dialogue platform between alliances,the instability of dialogue mechanism and the lack of foresight in the introduction of the interim measures,the industry contradiction is still prominent.Therefore,it is necessary to build a dialogue platform,widely build policy sites and guide both sides of the contradiction In order to promote the healthy and orderly development of new formats,new models and new industries,we should establish public value,enhance the initiative and foresight of policies through timely policy evaluation and adjustment.