Study On The Administrative Dishonesty Punishment System

Since the promulgation of the outline of social credit system construction plan of the State Council in 2014,in order to implement and implement the spirit of the outline,China’s legislative activities in the field of credit law have been carried out and experimented everywhere.In recent years,dishonesty punishment has made remarkable achievements in solving and governing the lack of social credit.Based on this reason,the dishonesty punishment system has been widely promoted in China.With the passage of time and the continuous advancement of practice,the dishonesty punishment work in various regions is in full swing.Because China’s current social credit system has not yet entered the mature stage,Many systems and practices are still in the experimental stage.Through the text analysis and Research on the legislation of dishonesty punishment in practice,we can find that there are some defects and problems in the creation and implementation of dishonesty joint punishment at the current stage.The basis of administrative dishonesty punishment in this paper mostly comes from the State Council or local government issued a certain operational cooperation memorandum or management measures and other normative documents Its document effect is low,which is also the lack of unified provisions of high-level laws.There are disputes on the definition of dishonesty and the nature of disciplinary measures in the joint punishment of administrative dishonesty.In the implementation process of some punishment,there are also violations of the principle of prohibition of improper connection and the principle of comparison.In view of the controversial issue of the Joint Disciplinary System of administrative dishonesty in China,this paper proposes to improve the level of the disciplinary system of administrative dishonesty and credit legislation from a macro perspective,clarify the specific content of the act of dishonesty,and clarify the nature of the act of Joint Disciplinary System of administrative dishonesty,so that it can be connected with the existing administrative substantive law.Furthermore,it emphasizes the protection of the information of the dishonest person,the protection of the private rights of the dishonest subject,and the construction of a legal and proper credit repair mechanism.