| The renovation of dilapidated houses in rural areas is a poverty-alleviation and people-benefiting project carried out by China to improve the living conditions of the rural poor.The construction of this project has not only greatly improved the quality of life of local farmers,but also met the new needs of the economic development of our country at present.In this paper,the implementation of dilapidated rural housing reconstruction policies in Quanzhou City is taken as the research object.Based on the theoretical basis of Smith’s policy implementation process model,the implementation of dilapidated rural housing reconstruction policies is studied in combination with the actual cases of each county(city,district)in Quanzhou City participating in dilapidated housing reconstruction.Through the analysis,this paper thinks that the renovation policy of dilapidated houses in Quanzhou has achieved certain results.Firstly,the living conditions of some poor people in rural areas have been significantly improved.Secondly,the renovation of dilapidated buildings to a certain extent promoted the economic development of rural areas of Quanzhou City,which is conducive to changing the old rural development model;Thirdly,the renovation of dilapidated houses has changed the planning and construction of the old rural houses in Quanzhou City,making the local rural housing planning and construction more scientific;Fourthly,the administrative management ability of Quanzhou municipal government departments has been reflected,and won the support and praise of the majority of whose houses have been rebuilt.However,although this policy of renovating dilapidated houses in rural areas is a policy for the benefit of the people,there are some omissions in the overall implementation of the policy by the government,leading to some problems in the implementation process.Such as,some measures fail to meet the policy requirements;The implementation of policies across the city is uneven;The execution progress is a little slow.After analysis,there are mainly four reasons as follows: first,The policy itself is more complex and the policy formulation is not reasonable enough,such as area restrictions of renovation of dilapidated buildings cannot meet the actual needs,The regulation of not installing houses aggravates the economic burden of poor farmers,the way that subsidy fund is received after building totally is unreasonable,The regulation that the stone house is all identified of dangerous houses does not accord with actual demand;Second,some of the executive staff’s professional skills are not high,the personnel allocation is not reasonable,the executive department’s coordination and communication is not smooth,the subsidy object information sharing system is not perfect,which leads to the flaw in the identification of the poor people who need the renovation of dilapidated buildings.Third,part of the poor farmers do not have strong will,whose diverse behaviors are difficult to coordinate,part of the poor farmers have stubborn thinking and seriously traditional superstition;Fourth,due to local natural,economic and social environment restrictions,poor people do not fully understand the renovation policy of dilapidated houses and do not cooperate with the government’s work.In view of the above problems,the author from the four aspects of Smith’s policy implementation process model to seek solutions to the problem of rural dilapidated house reconstruction policy implementation in Quanzhou.At the same time,the author combined with the actual situation of Quanzhou City,put forward a number of proper suggestions.First,the government departments should adjust the area of reconstruction appropriately and increase the requirement of innovating a variety of funding subsidies in the plan.Second,the government departments should improve the working capacity of policy implementation workers,and give them some vocational training and problemsolving ability training,rationally allocate and supplement human resources;Third,the government departments should improve the recognition of the policy of the crisis farmers,guide the farmers to get rid of the wrong idea,and get rid of the feudal superstition behavior;Fourth,To mobilize the strength of all sectors of society,vigorously develop the economy,improve the level of cultural quality,increase social publicity,and try our best to create a good environment for policy implementation. |
