| With the rapid development of the economy and the deepening of the urbanization process,a large number of migrant population swarms into the cities for development,who have become the main force of urban construction.In the National New Urbanization Plan(2014-2020),it is proposed to promote the urbanization development by gradually promoting the citizenization of migrant population in an orderly manner.However,under the background of difficult employment,the employment status of migrant population in the city is not optimistic.The migrant population migrates to the city mainly for the employment.Most of them are engaged in the labor occupation,so the employment quality is low.In addition,under the pressure of high housing prices in cities,it is difficult for migrant population to make the leap from " temporary residence " to "living in peace",and living in peace is more difficult than working in peace.As the most important aspects of people’s livelihood,housing and employment play a key role in the promotion of urbanization.In addition,due to China’s household registration system,it is difficult for most migrant population to enjoy urban public services in cities.It is not conducive to promoting the citizenization.In recent years,the group of migrant population in China is gradually differentiated.The proportion of the migrant population with higher education is gradually increasing,and the educational structure of the migrant population is upgraded.Based on the above background,in order to understand the flow status of the migrant population with different education levels and the similarities and differences of their long-term residence intention,the following research is carried out in the paper.Combined with micro and macro research perspectives,2017 Migrant Population Dynamics Monitoring Data(CMDS)and 2017 Urban Statistical Yearbook data were used.The migrant population samples from 70 large and medium-sized cities in China were selected and the ordered multi-classification Logistic model was used.The influence of employment characteristics,housing characteristics and urban characteristics on residence intention of migrant population with different education in cities was systematically analyzed.The study found that: First of all,in terms of employment characteristics,the overall employment quality of the migrant population with higher education is higher than that of those without higher education,and their willingness to stay in cities is higher.Among them,the impact of employment income on the willingness to stay in migrants with different education levels Significantly positive.Groups without higher education value employment status,and employment status significantly promotes their long-term residence in the city for employers.Compared with other employment characteristics,employment stability is the most important factor.Secondly,in terms of housing characteristics,the housing consumption of migrants with different education levels is showing an upward trend,and there is a higher demand for housing quality.Most people with no higher education live in the form of families,but because their income is low and the ability to pay in the housing market is weak,obtaining public rental housing provided by the government can significantly increase their willingness to stay in the city for a long time;Educating the floating population has no significant impact,but it can increase significantly when they purchase property-rights housing.Finally,in terms of urban characteristics,the higher the city’s per capita GDP and the higher the proportion of urban high-tech industries,the more likely it is to promote the willingness of floating population to stay in cities for a long time.Urban education resources in urban public services are the most important factor affecting the long-term residence willingness of the migrant population,and the impact of urban education resources on the migrant population is significantly positive.A comparative analysis of the differences in long-term residence intentions between the "not having received higher education" and "having received higher education" groups and the influencing factors behind them can be used to analyze the similarities and differences between the mobility status and long-term residence willingness of the floating population with different education levels Have a better understanding.On the one hand,it can formulate effective policies for the process of "grabbing talents" in cities.On the other hand,it can also attract more floating population to expand the urban labor force.Therefore,it is also hoped that the government can introduce differentiated assistance policies for different educated groups.Implementing policies in accordance with the city will not only help to further realize the equalization of urban public services,but also help enhance their willingness to stay for a long time,thereby realizing the further promotion of the new urbanization process. |