Clinical Research On The Treatment Of Persistent Postural Dizziness Based On The Method Of Soothing The Liver And Resolving Stagnation

Purpose:Objective to observe the clinical effect of Shugan Jieyu method on patients with persistent postural conscious dizziness.Materials and methods:Methods from September 2019 to September 2020,120 patients with persistent postural perception dizziness who met the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria were randomly divided into vestibular training group,control group and experimental group,40 cases in each group.The vestibular training group was given vestibular rehabilitation training;the control group was given luyoutai three times a day,one tablet at a time,combined with vestibular rehabilitation training;the experimental group was given Jieyu Anshen Decoction,one dose a day,warm after breakfast and dinner,combined with vestibular rehabilitation training.P300 examination,static posturogram assessment,self rating Anxiety Scale and international vertigo disorder scale were performed respectively at the time of treatment,1 month and 3 months of treatment.The results before and after treatment were summarized,and the changes were compared.The treatment effect was evaluated and statistically analyzed.Result:1.There was no significant difference in age,gender,P300 results,SP data,SAS score and DHI score among the three groups(P>0.05).2.Analysis of P300 results of vestibular training group,control group and experimental group after one month of treatment:there was no significant difference between P300 results of vestibular training group and that of treatment(P>0.05);P300 results of control group and experimental group were lower than that of treatment(P<0.05);there was no significant difference between P300 results of control group and experimental group(P>0.05).3.Analysis of P300 results of vestibular training group,control group and experimental group after 3 months of treatment:P300 results of three groups were lower than that after 1 month of treatment,with statistical significance(P<0.05);P300 results of control group and experimental group were lower than that of vestibular training group,with statistical significance(P<0.05);P300 results of experimental group were lower than that of control group,with statistical significance(P<0.05).4.Vestibular training group,control group and experimental group were treated SP data analysis at 1 month:SP data of the three groups were improved compared with the indexes at the time of treatment,with statistical significance(P<0.05);SP data indexes of the control group and the experimental group were improved more significantly than those of the vestibular training group,with statistical significance(P<0.05);SP data indexes of the control group and the experimental group had no statistical significance(P>0.05).5.Vestibular training group,control group and experimental group were treated SP data analysis at 3 months:SP data of three groups at 3 months after treatment were significantly improved than those at 1 month after treatment,with statistical significance(P<0.05);SP data indexes of control group and experimental group were significantly improved than those of vestibular training group,with statistical significance(P<0.05);SP data indexes of experimental group were significantly improved than those of control group,with statistical significance(P<0.05).6.SAS score analysis of vestibular training group,control group and experimental group after one month of treatment:there was no significant change in the SAS score of vestibular training group compared with the results of treatment(P>0.05);the SAS scores of control group and experimental group were lower than those of treatment,and the data comparison was statistically significant(P<0.05);there was no significant difference in the SAS score of control group and experimental group(P>0.05).7.SAS score analysis of vestibular training group,control group and experimental group after 3 months of treatment:SAS scores of three groups were lower than that after 1 month of treatment,with statistical significance(P<0.05);SAS scores of control group and experimental group were lower than that of vestibular training group,with statistical significance(P<0.05);SAS scores of experimental group were lower than that of control group,with statistical significance(P<0.05).8.DHI score analysis of vestibular training group,control group and experimental group after one month of treatment:the DHI scores of the three groups were lower than those at the time of treatment,with statistical significance(P<0.05);the DHI scores of the control group and the experimental group were lower than those of the vestibular training group,with statistical significance(P<0.05);the DHI scores of the control group and the experimental group had no statistical significance(P>0.05).9.Analysis of DHI score of vestibular training group,control group and experimental group after 3 months of treatment:the DHI scores of three groups were lower than that after 1 month of treatment,with statistical significance(P<0.05);the DHI scores of control group and experimental group were lower than that of vestibular training group,with statistical significance(P<0.05);the DHI score of experimental group was lower than that of control group,with statistical significance(P<0.05).Conclusion:1.The symptoms of patients with persistent postural dizziness were improved in the three groups.The treatment effect of the experimental group and the control group was significantly better than that of the vestibular training group,and the effect of vestibular rehabilitation training combined with drug treatment was better.2.The results of P300 examination and SAS scale scores of the three groups were significantly reduced,and the anxiety of patients was effectively relieved.The treatment effect of the experimental group and the control group was better than that of the vestibular training group,and the experimental group was better than that of the control group,with better long-term effect.3.The three groups of programs can reduce the DHI scale score and SP data index,significantly improve the dizziness of patients,the treatment effect of the experimental group and the control group is better than the vestibular training group,and the experimental group is better than the control group,the long-term effect is better.4.The overall therapeutic effect of the experimental group is better than that of the control group and vestibular training group,and the long-term curative effect is better.