On The Standard Of Proof Of The Leniency System For Admitting Guilt And Accepting Punishment

The leniency system of confessing guilt and punishing is a very important link in our country's criminal law.The application of this system can optimize the allocation of judicial resources and improve judicial efficiency.This is an important measure to advance the reform of the trial-centered litigation system.The system has the particularity of simplifying the trial procedures,but the theoretical and practical circles have not yet reached a unified standard for confession and punishment of cases.There are two certification standards: legal standards and reduced standards.What kind of proof standard is applicable to this kind of cases,This article takes the actual cases of confession and punishment as the starting point,combined with the existing theoretical research results,and analyzes the reduction of confession and punishment cases,which may lead to unjust,false and wrong cases,damage judicial credibility,and analyze the manifestations of unjust,false,and wrong cases and false reports.Misjudged cases,the reasons for impairing judicial credibility,from legal provisions and the pursuit of the rationality of fairness values,adhere to the legal standard of proof,in the case of repentance and punishment,adhere to the legal standard of proof,in the case of repentance and punishment,to achieve conclusive evidence rules Repent,remove reasonable doubts,and ensure that the victim participates in a series of suggestions.