A Comparative Analysis Of The Offensive Link Between The Chinese Team And The Top Four Teams In The 2019 Men's Basketball World Cup

The men's Basketball World Cup in 2019 shows the changes and development of world basketball techniques and tactics.The basketball teams represented by Europe and America are still at the leading level in the world.China's defeat in the 2019 men's Basketball World Cup reflects the gap between China's men's basketball team and the top four teams.The purpose of this study is to find out the gap between the Chinese team and the top four teams in the connection period of the 2019men's Basketball World Cup by studying the performance of the offensive techniques and tactics of the Chinese team and the top four teams in the connection period,to explore the main reasons for the gap,to put forward corresponding improvement suggestions,and to find out the reasons for the success or failure of the Chinese men's basketball team in the use of the connection stage of the offensive process,so as to provide reference for the Chinese men's basketball team in the training and development It provides a theoretical reference in the competition.By using the methods of literature review,video observation,comparative analysis,logical analysis and mathematical statistics,this paper analyzes the characteristics of the attack between the Chinese team and the top four teams in the 2019 men's Basketball World Cup.The Chinese team and the top four teams are taken as the research objects.For the basic situation of the participating teams,the starting mode,starting time,cooperation,number of participants,scoring method,scoring area and other data of attack application and tactical effect of each team in the transition period are studied in depth.The main conclusions are as follows1.The Chinese team is not as good as the top four teams in the offensive rebounds in the transition period.Due to the low defensive intensity of the Chinese team,the protection of rebounds is not in place.As a result,the offensive rebounds in the transition period are not as good as those of the top four teams.2.The way of scoring of Chinese team is too single,too dependent on layup.There are too many strong hits and direct shots,which reflects the unreasonable choice of the Chinese team.3.The use of cooperation in the Chinese team's joint attack is too single,too dependent on the guard's breakthrough.The Chinese team did not find a suitable style for their own attack with the transition period.4.The hit rate and success rate of the Chinese team in the transition period are lower than that of the top four teams by more than 20%.5.The Chinese team is very conservative in the choice of attack in the transition period.After rapidly advancing to the front court,they always want to turn these opportunities of attack in the transition period into positional attack and give full play to their advantages in the interior line.