From The Perspective Of Economic Law,Research On The Legal Regulation Of Online False Propaganda Behavior

At present,with the vigorous development of my country’s digital economy,online consumption has become the basic consumption method of the public,which greatly facilitates people’s lives.The rapid development of the Internet will inevitably have advantages and disadvantages,and online false propaganda is one of the disadvantages..In order to get more profits on the Internet and snatch the market,various businesses rely on some unique characteristics of the Internet to carry out some illegal acts,such as spreading false advertisements,swiping orders and other acts to increase the popularity of products and the popularity of stores.In order to achieve the purpose of attracting more consumers to come in for consumption.This kind of false propaganda on the Internet is completely driven by interests,including various illegal acts,infringing on the rights and interests of other businesses on the Internet,disrupting the order of network operations,and infringing on the rights and interests of consumers.Therefore,we should strictly regulate it.and control,in order to ensure the fairness and impartiality of the network order and ensure consumers’ right to know.However,according to the current situation,various relevant laws and regulations in my country still have defects in solving such problems.At present,these laws and regulations have no way to effectively stop the behavior of online false propaganda.There are still time gaps and blank areas in the relevant laws.2022 The "Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Internet Consumption Dispute Cases(I)",which came into effect on March 15,2019,further stipulated the conduct of false propaganda.Penalties for violations are also flawed.This article mainly expounds the network false propaganda from six aspects.First of all,it summarizes the relevant definitions and backgrounds of online false propaganda from research materials at home and abroad,and shows its theory and research methods.The second part is to explain the scope of online false propaganda and the inadequacies of some relevant laws and regulations promulgated by our country.The third part mainly describes the current situation of online false propaganda,which mainly include online falsehoods of e-commerce platforms,falsehoods of live broadcast platforms,and falsehoods of social platforms.Based on this,it is proposed that the regulation of online false propaganda can achieve the goal of maintaining online sales.Fairness,safeguarding the rights and interests of consumers,and maintaining a good online competition environment will keep our country’s economy healthy and speed up economic development.In addition,an in-depth and systematic analysis of typical related cases that have emerged in an endless stream in recent years points out the shortcomings of our country’s relevant laws and regulations that cannot effectively solve such problems.The fourth part starts from the main problems existing in the legal regulation of online false propaganda,including the unclear provisions on the constituent elements,the unclear responsibility for the co-occurrence of acts,the unclear damage compensation standards,the difficulty of the infringed party’s litigation jurisdiction,The supervision mechanism is not perfect and so on.The main content of the fifth part is to describe the relevant foreign laws,and through the relevant analysis of these foreign laws,it summarizes the points that we can learn from,summarizes the advantages,and puts forward effective suggestions for our country to improve the relevant laws.The sixth part puts forward some suggestions for the deficiencies of relevant laws in our country,which can be mainly divided into the following aspects: first,the legislation should be clear,the scope of violations should be clearly defined,and the elements of online false propaganda should be clearly defined;second,it should be clear The legal responsibility that the main body of online false propaganda should bear,so that there is a legal basis for the punishment of online false propaganda;once again,the standard of damage compensation should be unified,so that the legitimate rights and interests of the infringed party can be effectively protected;next,it is proposed that online false propaganda should be improved Suggestions on behavioral jurisdiction;finally,build a multi-disciplinary regulatory system to regulate online false propaganda from the regulatory level.