| In order to cooperate with the current anti-corruption work,China officially launched the reform of national supervision system in 2016.After less than two years of exploration,in2018,the Domestic Supervision Law was officially introduced and implemented,and the reform of national supervision system was carried out smoothly under the guidance of the government.As a result,China’s supervisory organs have been officially authorized by law,and their efforts to crack down on corruption of public officials have been significantly improved.Once the illegal acts of public officials touch the criminal law,they will be investigated for their criminal responsibility according to the Criminal Procedure Law.After the supervision Law was promulgated,China also started the revision of criminal Procedure Law to promote the convergence of the two laws.As the basis of sentencing,criminal evidence is the core carrier of the connection between supervisory organs and procuratorial organs.However,in practice,there are many problems in judicial procedure and practical application of evidence connection in supervision Law and criminal Procedure Law,which lead to disputes over evidence system in criminal procedure Law.Taking this as the starting point,this study focuses on the issue of evidence connection between criminal Procedure Law and supervision Law,and tries to find a feasible mode of evidence connection between Supervision Law and Criminal Procedure Law in judicial practice,so as to solve the problem of the connection between the two laws in reality.Theoretically,inspect and criminal procedure law has a close relationship between the two,two types of evidence law system cohesion is a necessary requirement for constructing rule of law in China,to further promote the anti-corruption legal system in our country has a certain reference role,through in-depth analysis,the application of the evidence in the judicial process problems in the supervision of the evidence standard series problems,such as;The evidence collection is mainly reflected in the connection of evidence qualification,"such evidence materials" and the connection of returning supplementary investigation.In the use of evidence,the main connection problems include evidence transfer,transformation and effectiveness;Accordingly,this paper puts forward corresponding policy suggestions from the three perspectives of the improvement of evidence application system,the treatment of evidence collection and the improvement of evidence application system.One is to perfect the evidence application system from the convergence of the perfection of the evidence system and the exclusion of illegal evidence rules in supervision Law and Criminal Procedure Law.The second is to deal with the problem of evidence collection by standardizing the system of collecting evidence of supervisory organs and implementing the classified management of collecting evidence and connecting the return and supplementary investigation;The third is to establish strict standards and conditions for transfer,review and prosecution,improve the evidence review and transformation procedures and clear the criminal procedure law to monitor the exclusion of illegal evidence to improve the evidence use system. |
