| The supervision system is an integral part of the national governance system,and the activities of “Promoting Reform by Case” around various cases at all levels tend to be regularized,and the supervising and reforming subjects make use of the special opportunity of case investigation and handling to adopt various governance techniques through specific organizational structures,which is expected to realize the transformation of power supervision from a single corruption governance effectiveness to national governance effectiveness,and from the improvement of the supervision system itself to the correction of institutional mechanisms in various fields.It is becoming an increasingly important mode of supervision and reform mechanism,which can be analyzed from the perspective of“structure-process-function”.At the structural level,the existence of vanguard political parties makes it possible for the political system to transform itself through supervision,while its democratic centralism and mass line provide the organizational principles and working methods for supervising and monitoring “Promoting Reform by Case”;the maintenance of the high-pressure anti-corruption situation is due to the continuous improvement of the power supervision system since the 18th Party Congress.The maintenance of the high pressure of anti-corruption is attributed to the continuous improvement of the power supervision system since the 18th Party Congress,which promotes the full combination,effective combination and organic integration of all kinds of system elements with the “four supervisory” integration,and establishes the system logic of“Promoting Reform by Case”,making it possible to debug and even reshape the relationship between the supervision system and the party and government system.At the process level,the opening and spreading of a particular case to promote reform are influenced by the nature of the case and the level of the case,respectively.The organizational debugging characterized by the cooperation between the “section-block” and the “commission-group”,including the series of meetings such as special meetings,warning education conferences and democratic meetings,the documentary politics of promoting the process documents and finalizing the result documents,and the construction of information platforms to broaden the channels of public participation,are some of the major factors for the debugging.Participation channels of information platform construction,is a common way and common links around the implementation of the case to promote reform.At the functional level,the inspection group,the discipline inspection and supervision group,the party committee,the discipline inspection and supervision committee,in the democratic centralism principle and the mobilization of the mass line to effectively break through the section power barriers and information flow barriers,making full use of the political advantages brought about by the investigation and handling of cases and The realization of the corrective function of the system includes filling institutional gaps,improving specific systems and improving the mechanism and ecology of system operation,and faces the tension between ideological education and corrective practice,as well as the challenge of transforming short-term corrective effects into long-term institutional effectiveness.Although “Promote Reform by Case” also includes the ideological education content and purpose of style building,its implementation focus and the main function is to make full use of the high-level or superior political power gathering and the "supervisory subject-reform subject" brought by the case within a specific window of opportunity.The process typically reflects and,to a certain extent,goes beyond campaign-style governance and special governance.The process typically reflects and goes beyond campaign and special governance to a certain extent,and its function highlights the features of the supervision system in the national governance system to further enhance the organic nature and improve the effectiveness,and to some extent,can be regarded as a rare stock of reform model innovation for a period of time.Nevertheless,the actual effect of “Promoting Reform by Case” remains to be observed in the long run. |