Research On The Positive Interaction Between Network Public Opinion And Judicialjustice

Network public opinion plays an important role in the supervision of public power,resolving social conflicts,protecting civil rights,communicating public opinion,and maintaining social fairness and justice.Therefore,online public opinion and judicial justice have also focused on a greater degree of concern,and people have carried out extensive discussions about it.On the one hand,online public opinion is conducive to the democratization of justice and the independent exercise of judicial power according to law,thus realizing the in-depth dissemination of law.On the other hand,the characteristics of the Internet itself and its mode of transmission will also make the public have a one-sided view of the problem when receiving information,It is easy to generate wrong public opinion,which in turn has an impact on judicial trials.Impairment of Judgment.This article hopes to maximize the positive role of online public opinion in promoting the judiciary,and minimize its negative impact,so as to achieve a positive interaction between the two,with good social benefits and value.The first part is the relevant research on the relationship between online public opinion and justice.This paper discusses the definition,and makes an in-depth analysis of the definition and connotation of network public opinion and the significance of network public opinion.This paper focuses on the importance and value of Internet public opinion,and discusses its characteristics and justice value.The second part starts with the advantages and disadvantages,and analyzes the dual impact of network public opinion on judicial justice.The positive impact is shown as follows:to ensure judicial justice and independence is conducive to promoting the democracy of our judicial work,ensuring the independence of judicial power,and preventing the abuse of judicial power.The negative effects mainly include:opening the"door"of irrationality,the network public opinion may destroy the neutrality of the trial,preset the trial result,infringe the principle of presumption of innocence,improper remarks damage the judge.The 3^rdpart discusses the mechanism of network public opinion on judicial justice.From the point of view of value orientation and restriction of the right,this paper analyzes the positive effect of online public opinion on judicial activities.On this basis,this paper discusses in detail the causes of its negative impact in combination with the Internet and the judiciary,in order to fully balance the two and reduce the negative impact of online public opinion.The fourth part carries out empirical analysis,combining with specific practice,and compares relevant foreign systems.It is introduced that South Korea and the United Kingdom mainly focus on the strict restriction of online public opinion,while Germany and the United States mainly focus on the self-restraint of the judiciary.Compare and analyze the application effects of the two modes in the network public opinion,In order to find a way to Striking a balance between the public opinion and justice network.The fifth part mainly puts forward targeted solutions to the problems caused by network public opinion to judicial justice.First of all,we should build a benign interaction mechanism between judicial information disclosure and public opinion guidance.Secondly,starting from our country’s existing legal system,this article discusses how to solve the problem of honesty in civil litigation in our country.On this basis,this paper also proposes that with the joint efforts of the government,media and citizens,a good network public opinion ecology has been constructed.