Application Of Purpose Limitation Principle In Government Data Sharing

The advent of the information age has brought convenience to people,but it has also exacerbated people’s concerns about the risk of personal information disclosure and abuse.The introduction of the Personal Information Protection Law has officially established the principle of purpose limitation.With the rapid development of "digital governance",the emergence of government data sharing has greatly improved the governance efficiency of the government,but also buried hidden worries about the rule of law.In practice,the principle of purpose restriction conflicts with the practice of government data sharing in China.How to handle the relationship between the principle of purpose restriction and government data sharing has become an urgent problem to be solved.Currently,government data sharing is constantly advancing,and the potential value contained in personal information is constantly being explored.Achieving the dual value of fairness and efficiency has become the goal of the goal limiting principle.The second part combs the practical practices of government data sharing in China through a combination of norms and practices,analyzes the conflicts between practical practices and the purpose limitation principle at various stages,studies the objective shortcomings and legal value contradictions behind them,and lays the foundation for subsequent suggestions on improving the purpose limitation principle.The third part is based on the requirements of the purpose restriction principle,guided by resolving the conflict of purpose restriction principles in the field of government data sharing,and puts forward suggestions for improvement.Establish special purpose restriction clauses in the field of government data sharing based on the requirements of clear purpose,usage restrictions,and storage restrictions,and improve supporting mechanisms to ensure the implementation of the purpose restriction principle in the mechanism.At the same time,establish exception provisions to avoid the rigidity of the purpose restriction principle and achieve the dual value of fairness and efficiency.