Multi-Modal Language For Teachers:Moving From Symbol “Separation” To Meaning “Glade”

Multi-modal language for teachers refers to the whole discourse unit based on multiple senses and symbol system.In the application of multi-modal language,teachers are prone to fall into the professional dilemma of language instrumentalization,accompanied by the distortion of the circle culture and language signifier,which leads to the rituals and reproduction of the relationship between social order and inequality.In the structure of teacher professional development,the ability of language expression is regarded as the primary basic ability of teaching and prerequisite of communication and cooperation.Teachers’ language is extensive and permeable,which is far more than its use in teaching and standardization as a tool.Therefore,to distinguish and prevent the pragmatic tendency of teachers’ multi-modal language and to make teachers’ language in a wider context has become a topic that needs to be paid attention to in the field of education research.This paper mainly adopts literature analysis,linguistics analysis and phenomenological research method to conduct the research.This paper reviews the relationship between multi-modal and language by combing the literature on teacher language and multi-modal.This paper starts with specific language materials,collecting relevant corpus of teachers’ multi-modal language,and analyzing the source and interactive ritual.By using the method of phenomenological suspension and reduction,the author reflects on the corpus in the way of directly experiencing the world,and explores the separation and glade of teachers’ multi-modal language.Citing Pierre Bourdieu’s field criticism theory and Martin Heidegger’s philosophy of being,the author expounds the symbol separation from the teachers’ performance mirror,language game,aesthetic separation and marginal effect.From the perspective of language self-reflexivity,symbolic conception and ecological edge,this paper expounds the glade of meaning.Based on the tension between separation and glade,the author constructs a path of “ritual thinking” from four dimensions of linguistic identity,linguistic intention,linguistic interaction and linguistic poetry.This path involves the following four directions,from the “social stratification” of power discipline to the “symbol man” role understanding,from the one-way mapping of “me in the mirror” to the “language person”projection of “I-you”,from “information enrichment” to “education” matrix linkage,from the modern structure of “value imitation” to the existence of “life man”.