| In today’s world,many countries have taken the development of new energy vehicles as an important strategic measure to deal with climate change and optimize the energy structure.China also attaches great importance to the development of new energy vehicles.As a developed country with rapid development of new energy vehicles,Japan has many successful experiences to learn from.Therefore,this thesis selects a comparative study on the international competitiveness and influencing factors of new energy vehicles in China and Japan,in order to provide some decision-making references for the development of new energy vehicles in China.This paper introduces the development process and status quo of the new energy automobile industry in China and Japan,and selects indicators such as net export index,revealed competitive comparative advantage index,international market share and total factor productivity,which are the indicators of the international competitiveness of the new energy automobile industry in China and Japan.to evaluate.Before 2012,Japan was far ahead of China in the net export index,and the gap gradually narrowed between 2012 and 2015.In terms of revealed competitive comparative advantages,in 2011,2013,2014,2016 and 2017,the ratio of this indicator between China and Japan was greater than 1,indicating that China had a competitive advantage in these five years;The ratio is greater than 0 and less than 1,indicating that China does not have a competitive advantage at this time.In the international market share,Japan is much higher than China,which is nearly 13 times higher than China in2017 and 2018 respectively.Although Japan’s international market share has declined in 2019,it is still higher than China’s in the same year.nearly 3 times higher.In terms of total factor productivity,the total factor productivity index of China’s new energy vehicles was much higher than that of Japan from 2011 to 2013 and from 2015 to 2016,and it has strong international competitiveness,but it has shown a downward trend in the past three years.less power than Japan.Based on the diamond theory,the article screened the factors affecting the international competitiveness of the new energy vehicle industry in China and Japan.The screening results were 14 influencing factors,of which 6 first-level influencing factors were production conditions,demand factors,and related auxiliary industries.,Corporate Strategy and Competition,Government Support and Opportunities.Accordingly,the data from 2010 to2019 was selected as the time series,and the data was standardized by the entropy method.By calculating the weight,it was found that the weight of Japan was generally higher than that of China,and only the weight of individual factors was lower than that of China.In the weights of the first-level influencing factors,Japan has a relatively high weight value in terms of production conditions,and the gap with China is also the largest,6 percentage points;in the weights of the second-level influencing factors,Japan is in the X1 per average GDP,X3 new The weight of the three influencing factors of energy vehicle production and X12 industry average weighted tax rate is 4 percentage points higher than that of China.In addition,in the ranking of the weights of influencing factors,the weights of demand-influencing factors in China and Japan both ranked first,at 45% and 41% respectively.In order to verify whether the above situation is correct,the multiple linear regression model was used to process the data,and the results showed that the absolute value of the correlation coefficient of the demand factors was the largest,which was consistent with the above results,and there was no multicollinearity between the factors,and the above results were more reliable.Finally,according to the analysis of many factors affecting the international competitiveness of the new energy automobile industry in China and Japan,this thesis puts forward specific suggestions from the aspects of accelerating the development of enterprise clusters,building international brands,and increasing subsidies. |