The function as object from the counterpart between Vd and Vs usually finds their expressions in their meanings as well as in their differences. This thesis, based on a study of the role of Vd and Vs as subject-object, firstly argues that, compared with Vd, Vs's easier tendency to be subjevt-object is gradually formed in its process of being disyllable. The Chinese prosodic structure syntax theory indicates that disyllable scheme has its internal existence both in its subject as initiative position and object as terminative position.Secondly, Vd and Vs as verbs has their differences in syntax : To begin with, Vs can be easily put with Cd as complement; to follow, the"Ad + Vd"metrica scheme formed by Vd falls into a cognitive mode together with the normal"adverbial +de +Vs"structure because"Ad +Vd"is similar to and can produce compound words verbs; and finally, in passive sentence as well as in causative sentence and object as out of information, Vs has the ability to bear stress in the terminals while Vd can not.This thesis concludes with the statement that the syntax differences generated by Vd and Vs share a close connection with both the mono syllables and the disyllables.
|