Clinical Observation On Treatment Of Migraine With Fire Needle Combined With Plum Blossom Needle

Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of fire needle combined with plum-blossom needle in the treatment of migraine,and to provide a basis for the popularization and application of fire needle combined with plum-blossom needle to treat migraine.Methods: A total of 60 migraine patients meeting the criteria were included in this clinical study,and they were divided into treatment group and control group randomly.The treatment group was treated with fire needle combined with plum blossom needle,once every 3 days,for a total of 4 treatments;the control group was treated with flunarizine capsules,once a day,2 capsules(10 mg)orally for 12 consecutive days.The VAS scores of patients before treatment and 30 minutes after the end of the first treatment were counted,and the degree of headache,duration,number of attacks,and accompanying symptom scores of the patients before treatment and the first month after treatment were counted,and the first number of patients before and after treatment The comprehensive scores and overall curative effect of the month,the second month,and the third month were counted,and the5-HT and CGRP levels in the peripheral blood of the patients before and after treatment were counted.The SPSS25.0 software was used for analysis and comparison.Results:1.Immediate analgesic effect: the 30 minutes after the first treatment VAS scores of the two group were significantly lower than before treatment(P<0.05);the difference was statistically significant through comparison between the groups,and the immediate analgesic effect of the treatment group was better than that of the control group.2.Comparison of headache scores in the first month after treatment: The headache scores of the two groups of patients in the first month after treatment were significantly lower than those before treatment(P<0.05).In the first month after the end of treatment,the number of attacks,the degree of headaches,the accompanying symptoms,and the duration of the patients in the treatment group were significantly different from those in the control group(P<0.05).The number of attacks,the severity of headaches,and the duration of the patients in the treatment group were statistically significant.The improvement of symptoms and duration was better than that of the control group.3.Evaluation of efficacy in the first month after the end of treatment: The difference in the comprehensive scores of the two groups of patients in the first month after the end of treatment was statistically significant(P<0.05),and the comprehensive scores of the patients in the treatment group lower in the first month after the end of treatment.The total effective rates of the two groups were 93.10% and86.67%,respectively.The treatment group had better efficacy than the control group in the first month after treatment.4.Evaluation of efficacy in the second month after the end of treatment: The difference in comprehensive scores between the two groups of patients in the second month after the end of treatment was statistically significant(P<0.05),and the comprehensive scores of the patients in the treatment group lower in the second month after the end of treatment.The total effective rates of the two groups were93.10% and 83.33%,respectively.The treatment group had better efficacy than the control group in the second month after treatment.5.Evaluation of curative effect at the third month after the end of treatment: The difference in the comprehensive scores of the two groups of patients in the third month after the end of treatment was statistically significant(P<0.05),and the comprehensive scores of the patients in the treatment group lower in the third month after the end of treatment.The total effective rates of the two groups were 89.66% and66.67%,respectively.The treatment group had better efficacy than the control group in the third month after treatment.5.Changes in the levels of 5-HT and CGRP in the peripheral blood of the two groups of patients before and after treatment: The 5-HT and CGRP levels of the two groups of patients were compared before treatment,the difference was not statistically significant(P(29)0.05),which was comparable;after treatment,the 5-HT levels of the two groups were compared(P<0.05),the difference was statistically significant.The treatment group had a better effect in increasing 5-HT levels;the CGRP content of the two groups was compared(P<0.05),the difference was statistically significant,and the treatment group had a better effect in reducing CGRP content after treatment.Conclusion:1.Fire needle combined with plum blossom needle and oral western medicine can reduce the headache degree,number of attacks,duration,accompanying symptoms,peripheral blood CGRP content and increase 5-HT level in migraine patients.Fire needle combined with plum blossom needle treatment of migraine can improve the symptoms of patients it is more prominent than oral flunarizine capsules.2.Migraine is very prone to recurring attacks.By comparing the VAS scores of the two groups before treatment and 30 minutes after the end of the first treatment,and the efficacy of the first month,second month,and third month after the end of the treatment,the therapeutic effect of the treatment group is better than that In the control group,the immediate analgesic and long-term efficacy of fire needle combined with plum blossom needle in the treatment of migraine were better than oral flunarizine capsules.