On Research Way Of Value Intervention Of Marx’s Economic Critique

Marx’s value interventional research way is not logical deduction that is based on value presupposition, neither abstract generalization to pure experience materials of capitalism. He advances in the middle road of fusion of the two research methods in economic critique that is an exploration of possibility of cognitional path that overcoming two split way of materialism and idealism. This research way is not only undertaken and highlighted for the Frankfurt school, is also increasingly recognized as basic thinking way of social science research.Marx’s critique of economy neither simple moral criticism to economy fact, nor absolute negation to capitalist economy reality, but a reflection of integration of fact and value, a construction based on deconstruction, a sublation of the negative of negative.Marx has criticized capitalist economy from four dimensions: critique of the relations of production is criticism of capitalist economic basis; critique of the fetishism is criticism of capitalist superstructure; critique of the classical economics is criticism of capitalist economic theory; critique of the alienated labor is criticism of capitalist economic reality. Economic critique of four dimensions that constitute two group of critical system: the critique of capitalist economic base and superstructure;the critique of capitalist economic theory and economic reality.Marx’s value interventional research way is reflected in his critique of economy.This research way refers to a social science research methods of Marx comprehensive and profound critique capitalism that in research of the alienated labor theory, the surplus value theory and the communism theory that he makes his holding value measures and value goals integrate into economic facts by way of reflection and evaluation. It is creative and constitutive cognitive way that between Marx as a researcher and capitalist economic reality. On the one hand, stressed the value criterion and value goal is shown by reality and law of social development; on the other hand, stressed research subject inevitably hold value criterion and value goal in the process of understanding and interpretation.Marx mainly used the research way in four aspects: The first is to preset eliminate exploitation and common prosperity as new targets of economic field; the second is to preset “free and conscious” as new properties of human activities; the third is to preset “comprehensive development” as new principle of human development; the fourth is to preset the “communism” as new society in the future.The value interventional research way is essentially solution way about relationship between fact and value, it has profound theoretical origin. On the theory of value, since Hume, many scholars explored this problem from logic analysismethod, psychology and social biology science method, practice method. In social philosophy, the problem originated from presupposition of Hobbes that is all against all people, Rousseau’s presupposition that conscience is foolproof value standard,Kant’s presupposition that good will is absolute values scale of behavior and Hegel’s presupposition that freedom is essence of spirit etc.The value interventional research way is not only internal support of Marx’s theory system, but also immanent reason that it has distinct class position and political stand. Significance of the research way to Marx’s theory itself in following aspects: The first is given Marxism that is unity of revolutionary and scientific;the second is given Marxism that is unity of theory and practice;the third is given Marxism that is to realize great revolution in the history of Marx thought. Historical materialism and surplus value theory is not value free, but is theory embedded value goal and value principle of Marx.The meaning of theoretical evolutional history to the value interventional research way that mainly embody in inheritance and promotion of the Frankfurt school. The Frankfurt school aimed at promoting Marx’s critical theory. Horkheimer considered his social critique theory was the same with criticalness of Marx’s theory;Habermas also believed that his theory is a continuation of the historical materialism;Honneth thinks in evolutional history of the recognition theory, Marx made epoch-making important provisions on the social struggle, and become to have the biggest effect thinker in human history.