The Ideology Construction In Hunger Narration

The paper looks into the Hunger Writing in the novels of the New Era., with a review of the contemporary literature discourse mode concerning Hunger, trying to figure out its logic origin and the evolving process,and to discuss the construction and the ideology`s mining of every kind discourse mode .The New Era started with the political reform in which the Left-wing Literary Theory was being abandoned and the rational individual daily life was being reestablished. Correspondingly, writings in the New Era began to give new meanings to the Economic Man and the Dasein, which led to the two options of writing, namely the mainstream writing with the criterion of reform ideology and the pure literature writing without an overall narration. However, these two writings found it difficult to continue in the Hunger Writing context after the mid-and late 1990s, as the subject created by the reform ideology became Suspicious and the Literature and cultural values of the pure individualized writing began to lose.One of the objectives of the paper is to go back to things themselves the implied discourse conflict and conformity in the Hunger Writing , with a comparison between the experience in history and the difficulties today, with a reflection on the mainstream writing under the guidance of modernity ideology and on the pure literature writing, trying to seek a possibility in the transformation of contemporary literature.The first chapter deals with the analysis of several forms of discourses in the Hunger Writing in the evolution context, and therefore reveals different semantic functions of"Hunger"in different times of the history, with the hope to provide a historical reference for the literature development in the New Era.The second chapter mainly investigates how literature breaks through the value mode of socialism and collectivism with the help of Hunger Writing under the guidance of the thoughts of modernization in the New Era, and how the reform ideology of"Efficiency first, equality not the least"is established with the choice of discourses like the dignity of"wealth"and the validity of"Get rich first".The third chapter attempts to reveal the logic in the evolution and the fallacies it encounters in the"individualized writing"which returned to"individual existence", while literature is trying its best to get rid of the political bond and establish integrality in the"individuality".The fourth chapter further probes into the biased nature of the reform ideology founded in 1980, and some limitations of the individualized writing, and the kinds of directions of"grass-roots narration"in the"reflections on modernity"point of view ,on the ground of an analysis of the Hunger Writing in the narration of novels since mid-1990s.