Study On "Book Of Songs" Literature In Sui And Early Tang Dynasty

From Han to Song dynasty, development of the Chinese academic has changed greatly. Its distinctive feature is the decline of Han academic and the rise of Song academic. Academic in Sui and Tang dynasty is important in historical culture because it is just in transition from Han to Song dynasty. Research about "Book of Songs" in this period also experienced a transition. It succeeds the characteristics of the Han's classical studies and arouses the research of Song. Clarifying and exploring features and literature of "The Book of Songs" in the period, not only is necessary to the "Book of Songs" History, but also help us better grasp the development of context of "The Book of Songs", understand the significance of their connecting link, and lay the foundation for future research.Apart from the introduction and conclusion, the paper is divided into eight chapters. In chapter One, I firstly analyze how the political and cultural environment in Sui and Tang dynasty promotes the prosperity and development of academic. in that period, strengthened centralization and unification directly impacts the academic development, document collation and dissemination; The Second part is an overview of the main contents of documents and the feature of the Times on "The Book of Songs"; Thirdly, the main value and contribution of literature is revealed.The second chapter is about the research bibliography of "Book of Songs" in Sui and Tang dynasty. "Sui Shu·Jing Ji Zhi" is another literature bibliography following the "Han Shu·Yi Wen Zhi", from which we can understand the "The Book of Songs" research and its' spreading in that period. In tang Kaiyuan period, Wu's "Gu Jin Shu Lu" objectively records the books before the Tang Dynasty, whereas mainly imitating "Gu Jin Shu Lu", "Jiu Tang Shu·Jing Ji Zhi" reflects the books Collection case in the tang Kaiyuan period. High value of the Tang Dynasty literature, including the "Book of Songs" recorded in the literature, mostly reflected the information before the Tang Dynasty, and is the basis and beginning point for research.The third to the sixth chapters, discussed efforts and contributions in the "Book of songs" document preservation, research and interpretation by Lu Deming, Yan Shigu, Kong Yingda and Li Shan. Lu Deming on the "Book of Songs" mainly reflected the achievements of the "Jing Dian Shi Wen", in which the "Preface" may be seen as a more complete bibliography works and is also a brief "Book of Songs" academic history. In "Mao Shi Yin Yi" explanation and proofreading to the "Book of Songs" literature, had a significant impact on the later ages; contribution on the "Book of Songs" by Yan Shigu, is mainly exhibited in his final version of the Five Classics, "Kuang Miu Zheng Su "and" Han Shu Zhu ". These works reflect Yan's Concepts on the "Book of Songs" in a more comprehensive way, and the contribution showed in which to the preservation of "Book of Songs" literature, Exegesis, collation even can not be ignored. In the history, Yan Shi Gu's research of "Book of Songs" is with the successful opening arduous; Kong Ying Da is a representative in this area, his "Mao Shi Zheng Yi", was later hailed as "Book of Songs" a master of Sinology works. This paper focuses on the features and contribution in the literature collation of "Mao Shi Zheng Yi"; Li Shan is a master of "Wen Xuan", he is famous in quoting the past literatures to interpretation of "Wen Xuan". As China's first poetry collection, "Book of Songs" has been repeatedly cited many times to address Annotation in "Wen Xuan". In this paper, comprehensive analysis and inspection will be done based on combing the literature source materials quoted from the "Book of Songs" by Li Shan.In chapter VII, history Notes, "Book of Songs" literature in Early Tang will be discussed, including the Sima Zhen's "Shi Ji Suo Yin" and Zhang Shou Jie's "Shi Ji Zheng Yi" and Li Xian's "Hou Han Shu Zhu." Their study to history books and notes promotes historiography development, also saves a lot of ancient literatures, of which there are many pre-Tang "Book of Songs" literatures. The contents of "Book of Songs" literature and the methods cited by the three books are summarized; meanwhile, the characteristics of the interpretation and preservation of "The Book of Songs" literature in the three books are also analyzed.In chapterⅧ, I discuss the Books and the "Book of Songs" literature in Sui and the early of Tang Dynasty, including the "Bei Tang Shu Chao", "Yi Wen Lei Ju" and "Chu Xue Ji". The three books not only recorded a lot of books before the Tang Dynasty literature, but also objectively reflected the "Book of Songs" dissemination situation and revealed learning and acceptance on "Book of Songs" at that time. In this paper, on the basis of "Book of Songs" original documents, theirs' content is summarized, theirs' expression fashion is studied and theirs' features are extracted; finally, the value and contribution to "Book of Songs" is revealed.Sui and Tang Dynasty, "Book of Songs" Literature is an important part of the literature in history. Launching a comprehensive study is of important academic significance and value. In order to show the basic clue of "Book of Songs" and "Book of Songs" Literature comprehensively and systematically in Sui and Tang Dynasty, I try to make a deeply analysis depending on compiling the original material and the interpretation of historical documents, and I expect to reflect the value and the basic situation of the "Book of Songs" Philology in Sui and Tang Dynasties. In research method, to adapt topics to their own needs, I strive to integrate macro and micro, combine theory with the facts, make history and logic integrate, and make use of phonology, etymology, philology, bibliography, textual criticism, textual criticism, literature, aesthetics, history, classical studies, cultural studies, hermeneutics, and many other Western expertise to analyze the discussion.