| The present dissertation, aiming at exploring the integreted proceeding of the political shunting of the Russian Federation,studies its jurisdiction new engendering, developing and working machenism.The first part is the introfuction, clarifying the sources of the topic, status of research, the literature review, the research design and the creation of the present study.The second part is the general review of the jurisdiction in the Russian Federation, mainly introducing the jurisdiction in different stage in Russian history and the judiciary theory and practice in Soviet Russia, focusing on the engendering of the jurisdiction in theRussian Federation.The third part studies the subjects of the jurisdiction-judges, discussing the setting of legal system from the perspective of safeguarding jugde-independence,and, in consideration of the professional decipline of judges being the same important to the independence and impartial exertion of jurisdiction,sheding light also upon the professional ethics of judges.Part four focuses on the Court as the ententy in charge of jurisdiction. Firstly, the court system of the Russian Federation is introduced by stating the independent court system is the most crucial safeguarding of judiciary independence. Then the province, institutional system, engendering procedure, the tenets of activity and the compass of competency of the Federal Constitution Court, the Common Courts and the Abitarary Courts are clarified in details.Part five conducts a dynamic analysis to the functioning of jurisdiction in the Russian Federation. Firstly, through the introducing of the positioning and funcition of the supervising power in the Russian Federation, the present dissertation holds that the supervising power is seperating from the jurisdiction,and is gaining a turn to early warning orientation.secondly, the participation of public calls out new progress-the restoration of jury system.Thirdly, magistrates appears as new subjects. fourthly, the administrative litigation extends the juristiction to new domains with new machenism.The fifth, the state specifically works out laws to protect the exertion an proper arrangement of juristiction. The sixth, new efforts are seen in extending jurisdiction by adopting precedents into the law. Since the independently functioning of jurisdiction can go without finacial supports, the last section introduces the safeguarding of jurisdiction independence by the Courts Administrative Bureau affiliated to the Federal Supreme Court of Russia.Part six is the evaluation to the jurisdiction in the Russian Federation. Checks and balance as well as jurisdiction independence proposed by the bourgeois are considered as catholicon to the saving and renaissance of their country by the Russian. But it is problematic when mentioning the defects in safeguarding the jurisdiction independence, the threat of over-expanding of administration to that independence, the defects of the checks and balance system itself and the austere economic situation in Russia , all these make the jurisdiction and the finacial safeguarding of its independence still serious.The seventh part is the concluding part.The present dissertation concludes that, the Russian Federation has already accepted completely the notion of check and balance,and related reform has already been fulfilled. Thus the present study will,as a cross-nation jurisdiction research, provide beneficial academic resources to the study of jurisdiction theory in a transconformating country, which makes it necessay to claer the foundation of our legal system when being reformed into a country ruled by law. |