The Debate On The Chinese Social Nature In1920s And1930s

There are three reasons why selecting "the debate on the Chinese social nature in1920s and1930s——from the perspective of the Sinicization of Marxism" as the research subject:firstly, it’s based on the in-depth study of the Sinicization of Marxism today; secondly, it’s based on the understanding and holding the relationship of the whole progress to recognize and persist the basic national realities of the Initial Stage of Socialism, to advance and deepen the construction of socialism with Chinese characteristics, to improve and develop the theoretical system of socialism with Chinese characteristics, and the Sinicization of Marxism; Finally, it’s based on the early study of the historical scholarship about the debate on the Chinese society nature in1920s and1930s. Therefore, The study that use the fruitful achievement of the Sinicization of Marxism to reexamine the debate on the Chinese social nature in1920s and1930s attempts to explore the historical status of the controversy in the history of the Sinicization of Marxism, and seek the valuable historical experience for insisting the basic line of the Initial Stage of Socialism, the theoretical system of socialism with Chinese characteristics and the Sinicization of Marxism.In view of this, there are main research methods such as the synthesis of macro-study with micro-analysis, analyzing document, comparison, individual analysis in the paper. It takes the debate on the Chinese social nature in1920s and1930s as the starting point of the paper, the theory and the practice of the CPC and the Marxist as basis, the formation of the concept of "Semi-colonial and semi-feudal" and the analysis of the Chinese "semi-colonial and semi-feudal" social nature as the clue, the historical process of the Sinicization of Marxism as the key line, therefore, the paper is based on the debate to reveal the importance in the theory and the practice of the New Democratic Revolution, to manifest the historical significance combining the Marxism and Chinese realities, and to provide historical experience for the innovation of the theory and the practice today. The paper consists of three parts:the introduction, the text of five chapters and the conclusion.The introduction clarifies mainly the value and significance of the issue, the research status of the topic, the innovation etc.Chapterl mainly analyzes the historical background of the economic, political, cultural and other factors on this controversy to restore the ins and outs of this history and grasp the historical status of the debate as a whole. The economic background was that the economy of Chinese urban and rural had been in destitution, the rise and the failure of Chinese Revolution were the deep motivation and the political background, the further spreading of Marxism in China was the theoretical basis of the debate.The main body is from chapter2to chapter4, it illuminates mainly the forming progress of the concept of the "semi-colonial and semi-feudal" and it’s social theory: chapter2and3are the emphases based on the writings of the representatives which analyze the Sinicization progress of the "semi-colonial" and "semi-feudal" concept, the forming and the using of the "semi-colonial and semi-feudal" concept, and how He Ganzhi, Mao Zedong and the others had eventually established the theory about the Chinese social nature. The two parts dissect the contribution of the Marxist in the debate from the perspective of the history of the CPC and the scholarship.Chapter4is the difficulty, but also the innovation of the paper, which is based on the perspective of the Sinicization of Marxism, it mainly analyzes the Marxist methodology using, the national conditions on the selection of the New Democratic Revolution road, and the role of the growth and development about Marxist theory and academic team in China. It manifests the historical contribution of the debate about "who","how","what" in the history of the Sinicization of Marxism, and highlights the relationship of dialectical unity between guiding Chinese realities with Marxism and elevating Chinese realities to Marxism.The summary of the historical experience and the contemporary enlightenment of the debate are the main content of chapter5, which analyse "how" and "why’ insist on the guidance of Marxism, base on the Chinese basic national conditions, persist in the innovation in the field of the theory and practice etc. The conclusion is the focal point and the end-result. The debate on the Chinese social nature in1920s and1930s enlightenments us how to cognize correctly the relationship of dialectical unity between the basic national realities of the Initial Stage of Socialism and the theoretical system of socialism with Chinese characteristics, to cognize correctly the only roads in the process of the Sinicization of Marxism that it must combine its theoretical transcendence with the Chinese specific reality.