The Thought Of Arches:Identity And Jewish Culture——Peer To Derrida’s Deconstructionism

In this paper, the basic problem is to discuss Derrida’s Deconstructionism of unique problem and the method, This dissertation is to some extent a solution to that problem through a systematic elaboration of Derrida’s deconstructionism, giving a answer to what is the meaning of arches and how to think about arches.There are totally four parts of this dissertation:why does Derrida reflect on this question? How do the predecessor consider on this question? How does Derrida reflect on this question? And why does Derrida reflect on this question in his way?According to the research of Aristotle, this dissertation argues that, the meaning of ’origins’ is ’original’ which means essence at the very beginning and derived from the originality there are some meaning:ontology, source, beginning, and origins. However the basic meaning ’essence’ is still kept in the different issues of ideologists in different historical periods. And Derrida makes Logo-centrism as the most fundamental characteristic of western culture, which means a substitute of metaphysics:binary oppositions. And this is the beginning of Derrida’s deconstructionism.In most academic researches, a lot of researchers are likely to concentrate on social realities, historic contexts, and different sorts of ideological trends to give answers to the problem of Derrida’s deconstructionism. But this dissertation argues that we are supposed to solve this problem from the point view of Identity, which is the internal force for the theory of Derrida. And from the perspective of the experiences as a child and growing-up and his Jewish identity, the dissertation is trying to give a demonstration for Derrida’s theory problem.And there are two divisions on how to reflect on ’origins’. Firstly, how do the predecessors think about this question? Secondly, how does Derrida reflect on this question? I put the one of the thinking resources, Heidegger’s thoughts, as the beginning of my illustration. This dissertation argues that Heidegger’s Etymologism and return current paths play an ’Inhitory Effect’ role in Derrida’s theory.For the former, the demonstration is surrounded by Husserl’s Phenomenology, Levi-Strauss’ Structure and Foucault’s "Insanity" writing to illustrate that Binary Oppositions are superficial and differentiation is the essence. For the latter, my demonstration is surrounded by Saussure’s General Linguistics、Levinas’s Other and Rousseau’s Supplement, which has the innovative value in Derrida’s theory. At the point of evaluating Derrida’s deconstructionism, this dissertation adopts the perspective of deconstructing deconstructionism, contrasting deconstructing origins with original deconstruction, and considers differance-other is the basis of deconstruction. Differance-other can be understood delaying the origin or the original delay. For realizing cognition, we have to acknowledge that we fall into a kind of recognitive mode or paradigm that erroneous and insight coexists. This dissertation returns to the dimension of Derrida’s ethics of science and technology, and considers the goal of deconstruction is cancelling central value and ultimate meaning. I think all these are not against belief and universal value, but deconstruct insight in the erroneous and erroneous in the insight in social reality.My methodology is picking up the original view of Derrida’s deconstructionism. And this dissertation argues that the purpose of deconstruction is to cancel central value and ultimate meaning. And from the view of Jewish culture, make an exact examination on "differance-other"、"language--object"and"Philosophy of the limit", to show that the essence of deconstruction theory.This dissertation argues that the consciousness of this question is the reflection on the problem of origins, which causes he always doubt about ’consistency’ in all his life. And the essence of his deconstruction of Derrida is some kind of using the resources of Jewish culture in Greek context.