College Of Humanities And Social Science Research Paradigm Of Humanistic Management

The development level of researches on humanities and social sciences embodies a nation’s thinking ability, mental state and civilized quality. Under the background of economic globalization and cultural pluralism, the management of researches on humanities and social sciences plays an important part in promoting the prosperity and development of researches on humanities and social sciences. However, while researches on humanities and social sciences among universities are developing rapidly, the management of them has exposed many problems such as "form overweighing content","result overweighing process" and "quantity overweighing quality". Besides, the phenomenon of low-level repetition for researches on humanities and social sciences among universities is serious, and there ae not many original, pioneering and integrated works that can be handled down classic. The main purposes of exploring the management of researches on humanities and social sciences among universities from the perspective of "paradigm" are to transcend physical exploration into the management of researches on humanities and social sciences among universities and to have a deep thinking of the fundamental problems.Based on the understanding of the scholars such as Thomas S. Kunn to "Paradigm" the research proposes "research management paradigm", namely the fundamental belief which the subject of the management of researches on humanities and social sciences believes in and the specific management patterns which are extended by that. The fundamental "belief" includes understanding of management essence on the ontological level, position of the theoretical basis of management patterns on the methodological level, humanity assumption of "person" in the managerial subject and object on the level of humanity, etc;"The management patterns" are specific management techniques, methods, means and so forth on the basis of common belief in the community of research management. Therefore, at present, the management of researches on humanities and social sciences among universities in our country belongs to modern management paradigm in the sense of paradigm, which is characterized by "supremacy of science" in the ontological sense, purely positivism in the methodological sense, unhuman culture in the sense of values and instant utilitarian orientation in the sense of functions.Researches on humanities and social sciences target human spiritual world and spiritual culture in human social life whose particularity is characterized as clear value inclination, close relation with ideology, flexibility and openness of research process, hard metric of research products and so on, and they are in conflict with the modern management paradigm of researches on humanities and social sciences among universities. The conflict is particularly prominent and intense under the background of ideological emancipation, mental freedom and the pursuit of innovative ideas. Longitudinally, in the early decades of the founding of New China, influenced by the discipline classification of former Soviet Union, universities hardly set up independent management institutions for researches on humanities and social sciences, most of which relied on management institutions of natural science research (Scientific Research Department or Science and Technology Department) for incidental management. During the Cultural Revolution, researches on humanities and social sciences among universities were stagnant or suspended, and the management of them existed in name only. After reform and opening up, the management of researches on humanities and social sciences among universities exhibited the features of "scientism""quantification" and "utilitarianism", and moved toward the extreme pole. Synchronically, the modern management paradigm of researches on humanities and social sciences among universities of our country displays in many respects. In management ideas, the quantity of research results is pursued and academic value is neglected; In management system, rigid management is reinforced; In management operations, research results are valued and research process is neglected.The modern management paradigm has violated the law of researches on humanities and social sciences among universities. The aim of the research lies in breaking through the modern management paradigm and building a humanistic management paradigm by following the guidance of complexity science and self-organization theory to resolve the conflicts mentioned above.In terms of the value orientation, the theoretical construction of the humanistic management paradigm requires the combination of stiffness and flexibility (the transformation from "stiffness" to "flexibility"), the compatibility of control and guidance (the transformation from "control" to "guidance"), the consistency of negligence and value (the transformation from "negligence" to "value") and the integration of quantity and quality (the transformation from "quantity" to "quality"); In terms of the construction strategy, its research management should always reflect people, serve people and be based on people, and it should also achieve unification of cultural management and humanistic effect, collaboration of humanity and scientificity and harmony of administrators and researchers, whose basic idea is to optimize and construct objective system, route system, evaluation system and practical mechanism in the light of the humanistic management paradigm.As for the practical exploration of the humanistic management paradigm, firstly, establish a community of humanities and social science research management with the feature of humanity, integrate both the humanities and social science research team and the administrator into the community, jointly discuss and project the development of researches on humanities and social science among universities and major reforms of the research field, and jointly set up research management system. Secondly, construct supporting system of humanistic management for researches on humanities and social sciences, try every effort to create a cultural environment, strengthen the operating organization construction of the humanistic management paradigm and reinforce operating system guarantee of the humanistic management paradigm. Thirdly, construct operating mechanism of the humanistic management paradigm, give full play to the pulling function of traction mechanism and the promoting effect of motivation mechanism and restriction mechanism, and keep the humanistic management paradigm working effectively. Fourth, practice effect evaluation for humanistic management. That is to say, establish the evaluating principles in which form and humanistic essence are paid equal attention, control and prevention collaborate with the process of good governance, and the integration of point and sphere is compatible with rational interest; establish scientific and effective evaluation system of humanistic management.